I don't see why the firmware can't compensate depending on what lens it
sees, especally if it's a kit lens or another lens designed in tandem with
the camera. I guess zoom/exposure-hold/unzoom (suitable only for the most
dextrous walkers+gum-chewers) or a best-guess exposure compensation is the
way to go then...
But I agree, why let a few good facts get in the way of a rant that's
probably true anyway
"Charles Dickens" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:cn2tfj$nb5$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hello Mike.
>
> Well, I thought this would be the case, and so I didn't mention the
> following fact, so it didn't bias the reply:
>
> "Many modern zoom lenses (including some of Canon's) are variable aperture
> zooms, and this method won't work with such lenses as you have metered at
> a
> different aperture to the one you'll be taking the photo at. The technique
> will only work if you use a constant-aperture zoom (such as Canon's L
> series)."
>
>
> "Mike" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:zJ6ld.24592$V41.10880@attbi_s52...
>>
>> You're freakin' kidding me??
>> If true, an attempt to leave a last gasp of air in the more expensive
>> models.
>>
>
>