«

Maybe Rob needs to learn how to configure it? Maybe Rob is nothing but a
Nikon shill after all?

Bowser wrote,on my timestamp of 23/02/2010 1:39 AM:
> Maybe Rob needs to learn how to configure it? Maybe Rob is nothing but a
> Nikon shill after all?

maybe dpreview doesn't have a clue how to test AF?

Rich <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>On Feb 22, 9:39*am, "Bowser" <i...@bowzah.ukme> wrote:
>> Maybe Rob needs to learn how to configure it? Maybe Rob is nothing but a
>> Nikon shill after all?
>
>Has a magazine or review site ever discovered a flaw? It is always
>the non-advertiser aligned users that do.

Oooo! A conspiracy theory!

LOL!

--
Ray Fischer
(E-Mail Removed)

Noons <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>Bowser wrote,on my timestamp of 23/02/2010 1:39 AM:
>> Maybe Rob needs to learn how to configure it? Maybe Rob is nothing but a
>> Nikon shill after all?
>
>maybe dpreview doesn't have a clue how to test AF?

Because it works for them? Isn't it the clueless ones who CANNOT get
things to work?

--
Ray Fischer
(E-Mail Removed)

Ray Fischer wrote,on my timestamp of 23/02/2010 4:03 PM:
> Noons <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> Bowser wrote,on my timestamp of 23/02/2010 1:39 AM:
>>> Maybe Rob needs to learn how to configure it? Maybe Rob is nothing but a
>>> Nikon shill after all?
>> maybe dpreview doesn't have a clue how to test AF?
>
> Because it works for them? Isn't it the clueless ones who CANNOT get
> things to work?
>

According to them, it works *if* one spends the time to fine tune it.
Wasn't the whole argument for AF that it's "simple and easy"? Looks like the
clueless at Canon have once again made a mess of it...

Ray Fischer wrote,on my timestamp of 23/02/2010 4:03 PM:
> Rich <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> On Feb 22, 9:39 am, "Bowser" <i...@bowzah.ukme> wrote:
>>> Maybe Rob needs to learn how to configure it? Maybe Rob is nothing but a
>>> Nikon shill after all?
>> Has a magazine or review site ever discovered a flaw? It is always
>> the non-advertiser aligned users that do.
>
> Oooo! A conspiracy theory!
>
> LOL!
>


No, the simple reality. The one Canon shills in the usenet refuse to admit exists.

Noons <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>Ray Fischer wrote,on my timestamp of 23/02/2010 4:03 PM:
>> Noons <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>> Bowser wrote,on my timestamp of 23/02/2010 1:39 AM:
>>>> Maybe Rob needs to learn how to configure it? Maybe Rob is nothing but a
>>>> Nikon shill after all?
>>> maybe dpreview doesn't have a clue how to test AF?
>>
>> Because it works for them? Isn't it the clueless ones who CANNOT get
>> things to work?
>
>According to them, it works *if* one spends the time to fine tune it.

You mean that one has to learn how to use a sophisticated tool in
order to get it to work well?

Golly!

>Wasn't the whole argument for AF that it's "simple and easy"?

No.

--
Ray Fischer
(E-Mail Removed)

Noons <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>Ray Fischer wrote,on my timestamp of 23/02/2010 4:03 PM:
>> Rich <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>> On Feb 22, 9:39 am, "Bowser" <i...@bowzah.ukme> wrote:
>>>> Maybe Rob needs to learn how to configure it? Maybe Rob is nothing but a
>>>> Nikon shill after all?
>>> Has a magazine or review site ever discovered a flaw? It is always
>>> the non-advertiser aligned users that do.
>>
>> Oooo! A conspiracy theory!
>>
>> LOL!
>
>No, the simple reality.

That's what all you crackpots like to claim.

--
Ray Fischer
(E-Mail Removed)

On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:01:03 -0800 (PST), Rich <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:
>On Feb 22, 9:39*am, "Bowser" <i...@bowzah.ukme> wrote:
>> Maybe Rob needs to learn how to configure it? Maybe Rob is nothing but a
>> Nikon shill after all?
>
>Has a magazine or review site ever discovered a flaw? It is always
>the non-advertiser aligned users that do.



I remember Ludicrous Landscape's glowing review of the Leica M8, in
which the sycophant Reichmann completely missed the very serious
infra-red problems with that camera's sensor that almost brought Leica
Camera to its knees.

"Bruce" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:01:03 -0800 (PST), Rich <(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote:
>>On Feb 22, 9:39 am, "Bowser" <i...@bowzah.ukme> wrote:
>>> Maybe Rob needs to learn how to configure it? Maybe Rob is nothing but a
>>> Nikon shill after all?
>>
>>Has a magazine or review site ever discovered a flaw? It is always
>>the non-advertiser aligned users that do.
>
>
>
> I remember Ludicrous Landscape's glowing review of the Leica M8, in
> which the sycophant Reichmann completely missed the very serious
> infra-red problems with that camera's sensor that almost brought Leica
> Camera to its knees.

Truth is he didn't miss it, he just chose not to report it. He's sipped the
Leica Kool Aid and can't be trusted for hardware reviews. Kind of like his
infatuation with the Sony A900, despite it's amazingly high noise levels.