«

http://science.slashdot.org/story/11...V-Range-By-300

I got all excited for a moment as I thought the topic was talking about
extending dynamic range by 300% then as my eyes swam into focus found out
they were talking about batteries. Nothing like building you up then ripping
you down, eh?

--
Charles E Hardwidge

On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 05:12:02 +0100, Charles E Hardwidge wrote:

> http://science.slashdot.org/story/11...uminum-Celmet-
Could-Increase-EV-Range-By-300
>
> I got all excited for a moment as I thought the topic was talking about
> extending dynamic range by 300% then as my eyes swam into focus found
> out they were talking about batteries. Nothing like building you up then
> ripping you down, eh?

I would not have thought of Electronic Viewfinder in conjunction with
dynamic range.

"ray" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 05:12:02 +0100, Charles E Hardwidge wrote:
>
>> http://science.slashdot.org/story/11...uminum-Celmet-
> Could-Increase-EV-Range-By-300
>>
>> I got all excited for a moment as I thought the topic was talking about
>> extending dynamic range by 300% then as my eyes swam into focus found
>> out they were talking about batteries. Nothing like building you up then
>> ripping you down, eh?
>
> I would not have thought of Electronic Viewfinder in conjunction with
> dynamic range.

I was thinking EV (Exposure Value) or stops.

--
Charles E Hardwidge