Photogtaphy Forums

Photography Forums > Photography Newsgroups > Photography Archive > Photography > First night-shots...

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

First night-shots...

 
 
J
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-19-2011, 02:04 PM

"tony cooper" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 23:34:15 -0000, "J" <(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Pete A" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>news:2011121605132358153-pete3attkins@nospamntlworldcom...
>>> On 2011-12-15 22:40:07 +0000, tony cooper said:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:41:50 -0000, "J" <(E-Mail Removed)>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> These are some shots I took at night...'in the pitch-black really! My
>>>>> first
>>>>> attempts at this kind of photography, so any critique would be
>>>>> welcome.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.pbase.com/fred/photos
>>>>>
>>>> Overall, you've done a good job. You've asked for critique, though,
>>>> so here goes:
>>>>
>>>> You tend to center your images. Image 1, 2, 3, 7, and 8 are all
>>>> centered. Try some with more water and less sky or more sky and less
>>>> water.
>>>>
>>>> Horizons should be level unless there's some special effect, and
>>>> special effects seldom work.
>>>>
>>>> I'd take 5 and 6 out of the series. They don't work. At all.
>>>>
>>>> Try to get PeteA to comment. He does some very similar stuff of a
>>>> seaport town in the UK.
>>>
>>> OK, you've twisted my arm. Here are my comments about night shots that
>>> include water.
>>>
>>> I agree with Tony that centred horizons don't often work, especially in
>>> a
>>> sequence of three or more shots. When taking wide-angle shots, I centre
>>> the horizon to prevent converging verticals (I don't have keystone
>>> correction software), then I crop the image to de-centre it.
>>>
>>> I take meticulous care over horizontal levelling. This can be
>>> problematic
>>> because certain optical illusions cause a perfectly level horizon to
>>> appear skewed - when this happens I may decide to forgo exactness and
>>> rotate the image slightly to make it appear level.
>>>
>>> There is no "correct" colour balance so it's a case of artistic
>>> impression.
>>>
>>> And finally, I have to mention the somewhat thorny subject of image
>>> presentation, specifically, the surrounding frame/border/background. I
>>> think J's images are spoilt by their white borders. The correct choice
>>> of
>>> surround is particularly important with this type of photography because
>>> it controls "the crispening effect in luminance and colour" The effect
>>> on
>>> luminance is illustrated in Figure 8.3 near the bottom of this Web page:
>>>
>>> <http://www.huevaluechroma.com/081.php>
>>>
>>> and the effect on colour is shown on the next page - I had to prove to
>>> myself that blocks A and D are exactly the same colour before I could
>>> believe it:
>>>
>>> <http://www.huevaluechroma.com/082.php>
>>>
>>> Enjoy.

>>
>>
>>
>>Made some changes to my photos.....
>>
>>http://www.pbase.com/fred/photos__adjusted
>>
>>Hope these look more 'pro'.
>>

>
> I think you've done a good job of cropping to present the images
> better than they were originally.
>
> Image #5 is a problem image, though. The scene is interesting and
> well-worth photographing, but this version just doesn't work. That
> mass of darkness in the foreground dominates the image and the bridge
> and buildings become so secondary that they aren't part of the image.
> It's a photo of a rocky area with a pipe with the good part in the
> distant background.
>
> I think the scene is worth a go-back for a second try. I like the
> diagonal of the seawall coming down to the left corner, but for the
> bridge and buildings to stand out you need to get in closer.
>
> Now that PeteA has brought it up, I strongly agree with him that the
> very wide white border is wrong. The whiteness sucks up the eye.
>
> I use a SmugMug website with a black background like PBase, and I like
> a border to show where the image stops. I use a 3 px wide white
> stroke, though.
>
>
> --
> Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida


Much appreciated opinion and I will re-do these shots I'm sure, keeping in
mind all you've said. Everything you said makes sense, but I just wish I was
armed with this information 'before' I fired a shot!

Thanks.
J



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
20D's first field trip. First Snake of Spring Celtic Boar Digital Cameras 3 04-10-2005 09:40 PM
First exprience with dust on sensor Sheldon Digital SLR 4 02-12-2005 05:37 AM
Goa - My first outdoor with Canon 300D Siddhartha Jain Canon 4 01-29-2005 01:04 PM
Just got my first non point and shoot digital cam and need advice No Digital SLR 13 01-21-2005 05:18 AM
What to learn first in Photoshop first & Tutorials Sean Photoshop 6 02-17-2004 10:29 PM