Photogtaphy Forums

Photography Forums > Camera Manufacturers > Canon > Fuel cell for Canon dSLR cameras

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Fuel cell for Canon dSLR cameras

 
 
Darrell A. Larose
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Rich
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-11-2008, 11:47 PM
On Aug 11, 11:28*am, "Darrell A. Larose" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/11/c...ell-dslr-were-...


So now in addition to being unable to focus, they'll burn up?
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
/dev/null/
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-12-2008, 12:21 AM

"Rich" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
On Aug 11, 11:28 am, "Darrell A. Larose" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/11/c...ell-dslr-were-...
>
>
> So now in addition to being unable to focus, they'll burn up?
>


....oh the humanity... Hey Rich buy a clue!

Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles are safer that gasoline powered ones. 1 US
gallon of gasoline (in optimum conditions) has the explosive potential of
14 sticks of dynamite.





 
Reply With Quote
 
Nospam
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-12-2008, 02:55 AM
In message <(E-Mail Removed)>, John A.
<(E-Mail Removed)> writes
>batteries: http://www.notabattery.com/
>

#
I could not find on this web site any specific values for capacity of
the different format of cells, discharge rates or actual charge times.

'Overnight charger' is the best I can find from the web site.

It would be useful to know this info because if they are viable and
better for the planet then I'm in.

--
Nospam
 
Reply With Quote
 
Blinky the Shark
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-12-2008, 04:35 AM
/dev/null/ wrote:

>
> "Rich" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Aug 11, 11:28 am, "Darrell A. Larose" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/11/c...ell-dslr-were-...
>>
>>
>> So now in addition to being unable to focus, they'll burn up?
>>

>
> ...oh the humanity... Hey Rich buy a clue!
>
> Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles are safer that gasoline powered ones. 1 US
> gallon of gasoline (in optimum conditions) has the explosive potential of
> 14 sticks of dynamite.


Well, no *wonder* it will get me so much farther than $4 worth of
batteries or fuel cells.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html

 
Reply With Quote
 
Blinky the Shark
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-12-2008, 04:37 AM
Richard wrote:

>
> "/dev/null/" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:g7ql36$6t0$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>
>> "Rich" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> On Aug 11, 11:28 am, "Darrell A. Larose" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>> http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/11/c...ell-dslr-were-...
>>>
>>>
>>> So now in addition to being unable to focus, they'll burn up?
>>>

>>
>> ...oh the humanity... Hey Rich buy a clue!
>>
>> Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles are safer that gasoline powered ones. 1 US
>> gallon of gasoline (in optimum conditions) has the explosive potential of
>> 14 sticks of dynamite.

>
> Under what conditions? Everytime some F----- cab has a propane leak in
> Toronto, they close a city block. Hydrogen's explosive power makes propane
> look wimpy.
> KA-BOOM!


Hey, if hydrogen is good enough for the Hindenberg, it's good enough for m

*%@(%$#^)$@NO CARRIER















 
Reply With Quote
 
David J Taylor
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-12-2008, 07:54 AM
Darrell A. Larose wrote:
> http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/11/c...slr-were-ready


Too big for my needs!

David


 
Reply With Quote
 
Eric Miller
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-12-2008, 01:29 PM

"Nospam" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> In message <(E-Mail Removed)>, John A.
> <(E-Mail Removed)> writes
>>batteries: http://www.notabattery.com/
>>

> #
> I could not find on this web site any specific values for capacity of the
> different format of cells, discharge rates or actual charge times.
>
> 'Overnight charger' is the best I can find from the web site.
>
> It would be useful to know this info because if they are viable and better
> for the planet then I'm in.
>
> --
> Nospam


If they were competitive with NiMH batteries in capacity, discharge rates,
etc., you'd think that they would advertise that.

Eric Miller
www.colibrihotsauce.com


 
Reply With Quote
 
Blinky the Shark
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-12-2008, 07:13 PM
Eric Miller wrote:


> "Nospam" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> In message <(E-Mail Removed)>, John A.
>> <(E-Mail Removed)> writes
>>>batteries: http://www.notabattery.com/
>>>

>> #
>> I could not find on this web site any specific values for capacity of
>> the different format of cells, discharge rates or actual charge times.
>>
>> 'Overnight charger' is the best I can find from the web site.
>>
>> It would be useful to know this info because if they are viable and
>> better for the planet then I'm in.
>>
>> --
>> Nospam

>
> If they were competitive with NiMH batteries in capacity, discharge
> rates, etc., you'd think that they would advertise that.


There's actually very little information on the site at all. It's all
low-key hype.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html

 
Reply With Quote
 
Blinky the Shark
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-12-2008, 10:05 PM
Alan Browne wrote:

> Blinky the Shark wrote:
>> Eric Miller wrote:
>>
>>
>>> "Nospam" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>> In message <(E-Mail Removed)>, John A.
>>>> <(E-Mail Removed)> writes
>>>>> batteries: http://www.notabattery.com/
>>>>>
>>>> #
>>>> I could not find on this web site any specific values for capacity of
>>>> the different format of cells, discharge rates or actual charge times.
>>>>
>>>> 'Overnight charger' is the best I can find from the web site.
>>>>
>>>> It would be useful to know this info because if they are viable and
>>>> better for the planet then I'm in.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Nospam
>>> If they were competitive with NiMH batteries in capacity, discharge
>>> rates, etc., you'd think that they would advertise that.

>>
>> There's actually very little information on the site at all. It's all
>> low-key hype.

>
> If you do a little digging you will find that the fuel cell in question


I admit I did not look any further than their site. That's where-the-hell
it should be explained.

> is a methanol-oxygen based device. You feed the fuel cell methanol, it
> gets the oxygen from the air.


From the air? They designate it an "enclosed fuel cell".

<snip, but thanks for the info and further questions>


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2Mp cell phone cameras notbob Photography 6 01-16-2007 05:03 PM
Just to add fuel to the debate about the canon kit lens piperut Canon 39 08-29-2005 03:09 AM
Cell phone effects on digital cameras david UK Photography 4 06-12-2005 01:23 AM