«

http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/11/c...slr-were-ready

On Aug 11, 11:28*am, "Darrell A. Larose" <spamt...@Xncf.ca> wrote:
> http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/11/c...ell-dslr-were-...

So now in addition to being unable to focus, they'll burn up?

"Rich" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:48306468-a059-4bb9-92e4-(E-Mail Removed)...
On Aug 11, 11:28 am, "Darrell A. Larose" <spamt...@Xncf.ca> wrote:
> http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/11/c...ell-dslr-were-...
>
>
> So now in addition to being unable to focus, they'll burn up?
>

....oh the humanity... Hey Rich buy a clue!

Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles are safer that gasoline powered ones. 1 US
gallon of gasoline (in optimum conditions) has the explosive potential of
14 sticks of dynamite.

In message <(E-Mail Removed)>, John A.
<(E-Mail Removed)> writes
>batteries: http://www.notabattery.com/
>
#
I could not find on this web site any specific values for capacity of
the different format of cells, discharge rates or actual charge times.

'Overnight charger' is the best I can find from the web site.

It would be useful to know this info because if they are viable and
better for the planet then I'm in.

--
Nospam

/dev/null/ wrote:

>
> "Rich" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:48306468-a059-4bb9-92e4-(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Aug 11, 11:28 am, "Darrell A. Larose" <spamt...@Xncf.ca> wrote:
>> http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/11/c...ell-dslr-were-...
>>
>>
>> So now in addition to being unable to focus, they'll burn up?
>>
>
> ...oh the humanity... Hey Rich buy a clue!
>
> Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles are safer that gasoline powered ones. 1 US
> gallon of gasoline (in optimum conditions) has the explosive potential of
> 14 sticks of dynamite.

Well, no *wonder* it will get me so much farther than $4 worth of
batteries or fuel cells.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html

Richard wrote:

>
> "/dev/null/" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:g7ql36$6t0$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>
>> "Rich" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:48306468-a059-4bb9-92e4-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> On Aug 11, 11:28 am, "Darrell A. Larose" <spamt...@Xncf.ca> wrote:
>>> http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/11/c...ell-dslr-were-...
>>>
>>>
>>> So now in addition to being unable to focus, they'll burn up?
>>>
>>
>> ...oh the humanity... Hey Rich buy a clue!
>>
>> Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles are safer that gasoline powered ones. 1 US
>> gallon of gasoline (in optimum conditions) has the explosive potential of
>> 14 sticks of dynamite.
>
> Under what conditions? Everytime some F----- cab has a propane leak in
> Toronto, they close a city block. Hydrogen's explosive power makes propane
> look wimpy.
> KA-BOOM!

Hey, if hydrogen is good enough for the Hindenberg, it's good enough for m

*%@(%$#^)$@NO CARRIER

Darrell A. Larose wrote:
> http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/11/c...slr-were-ready

Too big for my needs!

David

"Nospam" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> In message <(E-Mail Removed)>, John A.
> <(E-Mail Removed)> writes
>>batteries: http://www.notabattery.com/
>>
> #
> I could not find on this web site any specific values for capacity of the
> different format of cells, discharge rates or actual charge times.
>
> 'Overnight charger' is the best I can find from the web site.
>
> It would be useful to know this info because if they are viable and better
> for the planet then I'm in.
>
> --
> Nospam

If they were competitive with NiMH batteries in capacity, discharge rates,
etc., you'd think that they would advertise that.

Eric Miller
www.colibrihotsauce.com

Eric Miller wrote:


> "Nospam" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> In message <(E-Mail Removed)>, John A.
>> <(E-Mail Removed)> writes
>>>batteries: http://www.notabattery.com/
>>>
>> #
>> I could not find on this web site any specific values for capacity of
>> the different format of cells, discharge rates or actual charge times.
>>
>> 'Overnight charger' is the best I can find from the web site.
>>
>> It would be useful to know this info because if they are viable and
>> better for the planet then I'm in.
>>
>> --
>> Nospam
>
> If they were competitive with NiMH batteries in capacity, discharge
> rates, etc., you'd think that they would advertise that.

There's actually very little information on the site at all. It's all
low-key hype.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html

Alan Browne wrote:

> Blinky the Shark wrote:
>> Eric Miller wrote:
>>
>>
>>> "Nospam" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>> In message <(E-Mail Removed)>, John A.
>>>> <(E-Mail Removed)> writes
>>>>> batteries: http://www.notabattery.com/
>>>>>
>>>> #
>>>> I could not find on this web site any specific values for capacity of
>>>> the different format of cells, discharge rates or actual charge times.
>>>>
>>>> 'Overnight charger' is the best I can find from the web site.
>>>>
>>>> It would be useful to know this info because if they are viable and
>>>> better for the planet then I'm in.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Nospam
>>> If they were competitive with NiMH batteries in capacity, discharge
>>> rates, etc., you'd think that they would advertise that.
>>
>> There's actually very little information on the site at all. It's all
>> low-key hype.
>
> If you do a little digging you will find that the fuel cell in question

I admit I did not look any further than their site. That's where-the-hell
it should be explained.

> is a methanol-oxygen based device. You feed the fuel cell methanol, it
> gets the oxygen from the air.

From the air? They designate it an "enclosed fuel cell".

<snip, but thanks for the info and further questions>


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html