«

John McWilliams wrote,on my timestamp of 14/12/2008 1:35 AM:
>
> I'll bet you cannot, in 100 words or less, make a cogent argument that
> idiot and ****wit, as commonly used on usenet, are different.
>
> Knuckle dragger!
>

I'll bet you don't have a ****ing clue
what you're talking about.

In rec.photo.digital Alan Browne <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> Chris Malcolm wrote:

>> Minolta had a reputation for making extremely good lenses and not
>> quite such good camera bodies.

> Ahem, as an example, the Maxxum 9 is every bit as good and solid as the
> Nikon F5/F6 and EOS 1v and exceeds both of them in some areas.

I wouldn't argue with that claim. I was simply trying to put forward
an argument that wouldn't be too distressing to those ignorant of such
things :-)

--
Chris Malcolm

Chris Malcolm wrote,on my timestamp of 16/12/2008 12:58 AM:

>> Ahem, as an example, the Maxxum 9 is every bit as good and solid as the
>> Nikon F5/F6 and EOS 1v and exceeds both of them in some areas.
>
> I wouldn't argue with that claim. I was simply trying to put forward
> an argument that wouldn't be too distressing to those ignorant of such
> things :-)
>

What's the 9000 like?

"RichA" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed) d.net...
> Potential Nikon D3x buyers beware - D700x is already in prototype!
> Compared
> to the D3x, it's a no-brainer as to which is best. D700x has the same
> sensor,

By that same arguement, Nikon is already planning the D4, there will always
be another model!