«

What do you think about the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ5?
Thank you
CJ

"Besider" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>What do you think about the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ5?

It is very nice.

>Thank you

You're welcome.

On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 16:54:23 +0100, Tony Polson
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>"Besider" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>>What do you think about the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ5?
>
>It is very nice.

Tut, tut, that's not very helpful Tony.

I have to agree though, it is actually quite nice :-)

--
Regards

John Bean

"Besider" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote ...
> What do you think about the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ5?
>
Actually, I try not to !!

John Bean <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 16:54:23 +0100, Tony Polson
><(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>"Besider" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>>
>>>What do you think about the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ5?
>>
>>It is very nice.
>
>Tut, tut, that's not very helpful Tony.


The original poster was even less helpful, not even bothering to
mention what he might want to use the camera for, making it impossible
to give useful advice.

Under the circumstances, he got the reply he deserved.

;-)

"Tony Parkinson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>"Besider" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote ...
>> What do you think about the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ5?
>>
>Actually, I try not to !!
>


Mmm. Leica.

;-)

"Tony Polson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote ...
> "Tony Parkinson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >"Besider" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote ...
> >> What do you think about the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ5?
> >>
> >Actually, I try not to !!
> >
> Mmm. Leica.
>
You know me better than that Tony.

Mmm. L glass

;^)

Besider <(E-Mail Removed)> observed
>What do you think about the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ5?
>Thank you

You're welcome.

I bought an FZ3 last year and found it exceptionally useful for nature
photograph (12 x zoom). Excellent lens. very fast response time (except
focussing), but quick shutter response.

As a result I bought an FZ5, which I've had about 6 weeks. Still nice
features but results are not quite as crisp as I expected 5mp/3mp to
give me.

I still prefer my old Fuji 6900z for pictorial quality.

But I'd happily recommend the FZ5 especially at £235 from Pixmania (some
£48 less than I paid in July!)

Now what did you say you wanted it for?

(Or you could make me an offer for my FZ3!)

Mike

[The reply-to address is valid for 30 days from this posting]
--
Michael J Davis
<><
Some newsgroup contributors appear to have confused
the meaning of "discussion" with "digression".
<><