SMS <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>Rich wrote:
>> 26-624mm equivalent and (of course) the ubiquitous, crappy 1/2.33" P&S
>> sensor. Plus raw mode and 3200 ISO.
>
>ISO 6400 for 3M or less, LOL.
>
>> Can you even begin to imagine the noise in such an image?
>
>Doesn't matter. There's clearly a market for people who don't care at
>all about the quality of the image and are more concerned with having
>the most megapixels, the widest range zoom, and the biggest LCD.
There isn't a person posting here who isn't willing to accept
compromises in image quality in order to get a camera that they
can use for an acceptable price. Some of them are arrogant snobs
who think that only their compromises are acceptable.
--
Ray Fischer
(E-Mail Removed)