<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed) oups.com...
> In most discussion about digital SLR cameras, people are referring to
> either Canon or Nikon cameras as the standard level of good quality
> products. There are also talks about Pentax, Olympus, Fuji and Sony.
> However, Canon and Nikon appears to dominate the market for high
> digital SLR.
> My question is about Samsung digital cameras - GX10, GX-1S, GX-1L. The
> perception about these brand name is relatively low. I knew that the
> technology ofr Samsung is shared from Pentax cameras. However, when I
> read articles on these cameras at dpreview, their ratings are higher
> than Nikon, Canon or others.
> Are these cameras worth to consider? Sometimes, a good quality cameras
> has superior quality over time (fine things, like buttons, switches,
> etc are designed more rugged than cheaper cameras). Would anyone
> comment about long term use of these cameras?
>
> I have a small Samsung digimax i5. It was rated as an average camera
> (some considered below average). I like it because of its price and
> size. So far, I am happy with this camera. I must have click the
> shutter button over 1500 times within the past 6 months. It seems to
> be an OK camera. Are samsung digital SLRs, however better than Canon
> and Nikon? Is it better than its 'sibling",i.e. the Pentax ?
Nikon and Canon have been around a long time. Samsung makes good stuff too.
Brand wars are boring. If you like the feature set of a given camera and it
meets all of your present needs and gives some room for growth, that's all
that matters (assuming that price, warranties and company stability are also
decent).
|
Linear Mode
