«

New pictures, comments welcome.

Flowers & city backdrop. It was actually quite an ordeal to set up. I
think it was successful.
<http://www.edgehill.net/1/?SC=go.php&DIR=California/Bay-Area/San-Francisco/our-garden/more/2005-03-02-trillium-maple>


An unusual architectural shot. Maybe interesting or maybe too disorienting?
<http://www.edgehill.net/1/?SC=go.php&DIR=California/Bay-Area/San-Francisco/neighborhoods/2005-03-02-mission>

paul wrote:

> New pictures, comments welcome.
>
> Flowers & city backdrop. It was actually quite an ordeal to set up. I
> think it was successful.
>
<http://www.edgehill.net/1/?SC=go.php&DIR=California/Bay-Area/San-Francisco/our-garden/more/2005-03-02-trillium-maple>
>

I like.. The foreground could stand a touch of sharpening, might just be due
to downsampling?

>
> An unusual architectural shot. Maybe interesting or maybe too
> disorienting?
>
<http://www.edgehill.net/1/?SC=go.php&DIR=California/Bay-Area/San-Francisco/neighborhoods/2005-03-02-mission>

Make me dizzy..
--

Stacey

Stacey wrote:

> paul wrote:
>
>
>>New pictures, comments welcome.
>>
>>Flowers & city backdrop. It was actually quite an ordeal to set up. I
>>think it was successful.
>>
>
> <http://www.edgehill.net/1/?SC=go.php&DIR=California/Bay-Area/San-Francisco/our-garden/more/2005-03-02-trillium-maple>
>
>
> I like.. The foreground could stand a touch of sharpening, might just be due
> to downsampling?


Thanks. Only the one creamy flower at the side is in focus. Kind of
extreme but maybe too subtle to work to best effect also. I was mostly
looking at the right amount of defocus in the background & that's f/36.
Less zoom had them all in focus & the background more focused looking
but foreground/background were too disjointed.



>
>>An unusual architectural shot. Maybe interesting or maybe too
>>disorienting?
>>
>
> <http://www.edgehill.net/1/?SC=go.php&DIR=California/Bay-Area/San-Francisco/neighborhoods/2005-03-02-mission>
>
> Make me dizzy..