Re: 24 x 36 10D print anyone?

Can you tell me please the file size that came from the camera?
JT

"Admiral" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:%HwJa.358$(E-Mail Removed)...
> http://users.bigpond.net.au/admiral/images/24x36.jpg
>
> Please excuse the shitty quality of the photo, it was just a quick snap to
> illustrate the size of the enlargement.
>
> From normal viewing distance it looks perfect, close up it begins to show
> the limitations of a six megapixel file, and around some of the really
> bright lights in the bottom left you can see a few tiny jpg artifacts, but
> apart from that, HOLY ****.
>
> I'm totally impressed.
>
> The original photo was taken with a 10D and Sigma 15-30.
>
> -A
>
>




Auspics

Sure, the original filesize was a humble 2045KB.

-A

"Auspics" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:iOzKa.674$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Can you tell me please the file size that came from the camera?
> JT
>

Sorry to keep at it Admiral...
Was that raw or a jpg?
JT

"Admiral" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:eXGKa.1037$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Sure, the original filesize was a humble 2045KB.
>
> -A
>
> "Auspics" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:iOzKa.674$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Can you tell me please the file size that came from the camera?
> > JT
> >
>
>
>

I don't mind mate... it was a jpg.

I very rarely shoot RAW, mainly because i've never taken the time to learn
how to effectively process it. It's on my "to do" list. =0)

-A

"Auspics" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:EtJKa.24$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Sorry to keep at it Admiral...
> Was that raw or a jpg?
> JT
>
> "Admiral" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:eXGKa.1037$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Sure, the original filesize was a humble 2045KB.
> >
> > -A
> >
> > "Auspics" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:iOzKa.674$(E-Mail Removed)...
> > > Can you tell me please the file size that came from the camera?
> > > JT
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>