|
|||||||||
|
|
#1
|
|
Klaatu wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 22:14:23 +0100, Angry Angel > <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote: > >> On 30/6/03 1:24 pm, "Klaatu" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 23:06:18 +0000 (UTC), "Martin Francis" >>> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote: >>> >> <snip> >>>> * don't buy Nikon-AF fit lenses. They work, but the focusing feels >>>> bad and any you can afford are likely to be poor. Manual focus = >>>> bang for buck. >>> >>> My FM is MF only - but I agree anywise. >> <snip> >> >> The FM (as with all manual focus F-mount Nikons) can use any AF lens >> which isn't a 'G' (those without aperture ring) although for Pre-AI >> cameras AF lenses, like Series E MF lenses, require the 'rabbit ear' >> prongs to be added. >> >> Some of the AF zooms sell cheaper than MF equivolents, and cover >> ranges not available in MF lenses, so if you can put up with the bad >> focussing feel they can be considered. AF lenses, especially zooms, >> will have modern designs which give (in general) better performance >> and smaller size and weight. > > Useful to know. > > >> I have the old 75-300mm f4.5-5.6 AF model with a tripod mount, which >> cost £150 from a reputable used dealer with guarantee, so they can >> probably be obtained within your £100 budget from private sales. Not >> that pleasurable to focus manually, but forwards compatible with AF >> if you ever need it in the future. > > 75-300 would be ideal as I photgraph any thing from people to planes. > > The focussing is not a problem. > Interested to know why difficult focussing would not be a problem? Mike Sendrove |
![]() |
| Tags |
| lense, nikon |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|