Re: What happened?

The problem is this is NOT a binaries News Group. That means you are not allowed to post
binary files.

If you see the name "binaries" in the name of the News Group then posting attachments is
allowed. If you don't then posting attachments is not allowed.

In addition, the News Group Charter/FAQ states that binary attachments are not permitted.
http://tinyurl.com/6sayd

Pertinent Excerpt:
------------------
What Is Not Permitted:

- Posts from mail2news gateways and/or anonymous remailers
- Flame wars (comparisons between different digital SLR brands or
systems are permitted as long as they do not degenerate into personal
flames)
- Signatures with more than 4 lines
- Exchange and/or discussion of illegal software
- Personal attacks
- Binary postings (i.e. non text postings) other than PGP and small binary
signatures
- Commercial advertisements:


Dave



"Kent McPherson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:WoqdnQidsNorFzXcRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
| I got a Canon Digital Rebel a couple months ago and I've had this happen
| twice. When using the built-in flash, it's like the picture gets half
| exposed, i.e. half the picture is lighted and half is not. I've attached a
| sample so you can see what I'm talk about. The picture is safe. Any ideas?
|
|
|




David H. Lipman

Your using to fast a shutter speed.
"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
news:b50qd.435$dv5.149@trnddc07...
> The problem is this is NOT a binaries News Group. That means you are not
> allowed to post
> binary files.
>
> If you see the name "binaries" in the name of the News Group then posting
> attachments is
> allowed. If you don't then posting attachments is not allowed.
>
> In addition, the News Group Charter/FAQ states that binary attachments are
> not permitted.
> http://tinyurl.com/6sayd
>
> Pertinent Excerpt:
> ------------------
> What Is Not Permitted:
>
> - Posts from mail2news gateways and/or anonymous remailers
> - Flame wars (comparisons between different digital SLR brands or
> systems are permitted as long as they do not degenerate into personal
> flames)
> - Signatures with more than 4 lines
> - Exchange and/or discussion of illegal software
> - Personal attacks
> - Binary postings (i.e. non text postings) other than PGP and small binary
> signatures
> - Commercial advertisements:
>
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> "Kent McPherson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:WoqdnQidsNorFzXcRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
> | I got a Canon Digital Rebel a couple months ago and I've had this happen
> | twice. When using the built-in flash, it's like the picture gets half
> | exposed, i.e. half the picture is lighted and half is not. I've
> attached a
> | sample so you can see what I'm talk about. The picture is safe. Any
> ideas?
> |
> |
> |
>
>

Jim wrote:

> Your using to fast a shutter speed.

No: that would produce a straight line and a totally dark area where the shutter
covers the sensor.

He 'vigenetted' the flash, either with his hand or the lens hood.

Cheers,
Alan


--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- [SI] rulz: http://www.aliasimages.com/si/rulz.html
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.

In article <coa82l$5et$(E-Mail Removed)>, (E-Mail Removed)
says...
>
>Jim wrote:
>
>> Your using to fast a shutter speed.
>
>No: that would produce a straight line and a totally dark area where the
shutter
>
>covers the sensor.
>
>He 'vigenetted' the flash, either with his hand or the lens hood.
>
>Cheers,
>Alan

Exactly. If one uses the built-in flash, and, say the lens hood for the 12-24
Nikkor, they will get a variation of this shadow, every time.

Hunt