|
|||||||||
|
|
#1
|
|
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 19:27:18 -0400, "Michael A. Covington"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote: > >Tri-X Pan is an excellent film to start with because it is tolerant of >exposure errors and processing errors. You will not have to do much >experimenting to find the right development time before you start getting >good pictures. I've often wondered what is so tolerant about Tri-X. Frankly it can develop contrasty highlights like nobodies business, drop shadow detail in the blink of an eye and being less hardened than T-Max it's more sensitive to temperature variations. In contrast T-Max can develop a very straight-lined contrast gradient even when over-exposed by 4~6 stops. It can handle any temperature variations within reason and it's simply a durable film to work with. Regards, John - Photographer & Webmaster - http://www.darkroompro.com A summation of American society after 9/11: Never have so many known so much and yet done so little. John |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
John <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
: On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 19:27:18 -0400, "Michael A. Covington" : <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote: :> :>Tri-X Pan is an excellent film to start with because it is tolerant of :>exposure errors and processing errors. You will not have to do much :>experimenting to find the right development time before you start getting :>good pictures. : I've often wondered what is so tolerant about Tri-X. Frankly it can : develop contrasty highlights like nobodies business, drop shadow detail in the : blink of an eye and being less hardened than T-Max it's more sensitive to : temperature variations. In contrast T-Max can develop a very straight-lined : contrast gradient even when over-exposed by 4~6 stops. It can handle any : temperature variations within reason and it's simply a durable film to work : with. I agree that Tmax is a fine film. The problem that I see a beginner<SP?> having with is it's sensitivity to processing. -- Keep working millions on welfare depend on you ------------------- (E-Mail Removed) |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 00:25:35 -0500, Frank Pittel <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote: >: I've often wondered what is so tolerant about Tri-X. Frankly it can >: develop contrasty highlights like nobodies business, drop shadow detail in the >: blink of an eye and being less hardened than T-Max it's more sensitive to >: temperature variations. In contrast T-Max can develop a very straight-lined >: contrast gradient even when over-exposed by 4~6 stops. It can handle any >: temperature variations within reason and it's simply a durable film to work >: with. > >I agree that Tmax is a fine film. The problem that I see a beginner<SP?> >having with is it's sensitivity to processing. This seems to be the source of Tri-X's "tolerance" but all one has to do is dilute the developer to add in some tolerance as any effect of processing variations will be minimized in the longer development times. I had this same problem myself when using T-Max developer at the 1:4 concentration and went to the 1:9 dilution. Problem solved. Use a two-bath fix and a good hypo-clear and your all done. Regards, John - Photographer & Webmaster - http://www.darkroompro.com A summation of American society after 9/11: Never have so many known so much and yet done so little. |
![]() |
| Tags |
| bandw, film, start |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|