|
|||||||||
|
|
#1
|
|
I use both Tmax100 and Tri-X. I am comfortable with both, but I have seen a
lot of print that suggests that Tri-X in D-76 is a very good choice since it is quite tolerant of processing variation. Tmax (I use Tmax developer) is apparently somewhat more sensitive to processing issues, and therefore Tri-X is a good place to start home processing "Paul W. Ross" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed) om... > Well, frankly, I like Plus-X or Tmax-100, which I bulk load. I usually > have sufficient light available for my B&W work so that I can use a > slower film, and get the best resolution I can. > > For developers, either Agfa Rodinol (1:25) or Kodak HC-110 (dilution > B), as they are both easy to "single shot" develop -- discard mixed > developer after one use. > > The issue on "old technology" is that the newer stuff -- Tmax -- is > both a different grain size/shape, and a thinner emulsion. The thinner > emulsion leads to highter acutance -- ability to accurately deal with > sharp edges. The old (?) Adox KB-xx films were thin emulsion types, I > believe. > > Somebody has a nice page on HC-110 -- history, usage, etc. Do a Google > search. Pieter Litchfield |
![]() |
| Tags |
| bandw, film, start |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|