|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|
If one split a developer in active part/carbonate, for how long will
the carbonate solution keep (normal usage - bottle starts full and goes empty with usage). I understand that slowly carbonate will become bicarbonate. Would adding sulphite help? Does it changes pH? Thanks, Jorge Jorge Omar |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jorge Omar" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed) om... > If one split a developer in active part/carbonate, for how long will > the carbonate solution keep (normal usage - bottle starts full and > goes empty with usage). > I understand that slowly carbonate will become bicarbonate. > Would adding sulphite help? Does it changes pH? > > Thanks, > > Jorge Sodium carbonate is the bottom of the line as far as oxidation is concerned. That indicates that there should be no deterioration in storage. I wouldn't worry about it. However the material is so cheap and available, I see no point is long term storage. When preparing my developer, I dump all the old and start everything from scratch. That way there is never a question as to when, what, where. It would be advisable to dump used solutions after use as the carryover of developer will eventually render the carbonate solution a little "hot" and the advantage of the two solution technique will be lost. Truly, dr bob. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 08:11:23 -0400, "dr bob" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >"Jorge Omar" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >news:(E-Mail Removed). com... >> If one split a developer in active part/carbonate, for how long will >> the carbonate solution keep (normal usage - bottle starts full and >> goes empty with usage). >> I understand that slowly carbonate will become bicarbonate. >> Would adding sulphite help? Does it changes pH? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jorge > >Sodium carbonate is the bottom of the line as far as oxidation is concerned. >That indicates that there should be no deterioration in storage. I wouldn't >worry about it. However the material is so cheap and available, I see no >point is long term storage. When preparing my developer, I dump all the old >and start everything from scratch. That way there is never a question as to >when, what, where. > >It would be advisable to dump used solutions after use as the carryover of >developer will eventually render the carbonate solution a little "hot" and >the advantage of the two solution technique will be lost. I think he means split stock and not divided development. Of course I agree that carbonate will keep a very, very long time either in solution or dry. If making a stock solution one does need to be aware of it's solubility though. Carbonate can precipitate out of solution to form something like crystals in the bottom of the bottle. John |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, it's to split a developer and not for two bath development.
Reason for the question is 'cause I found two times in the NET - 3 months and one year. Very coherent... Thanks, Jorge |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 16 Jul 2003 13:52:59 -0700, (E-Mail Removed) (Jorge Omar) wrote:
>Yes, it's to split a developer and not for two bath development. > >Reason for the question is 'cause I found two times in the NET - 3 >months and one year. >Very coherent... Can you give me some more details on exactly what you are contemplating ? Something like FX-2 ? John |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Like...
About 20 yrs ago (in another photo life) I've used the better part of an HC-110 bottle at a dillution of 1+63 (concentrate) plus carbonate (1g/L) and benzotriazole (1cc/L of 1% solution). I'm testing TMX with this soup (it becomes kind of compensating) to see if I can tame blown higlights. The reason for the question is if carb solution keeps a short time, I would mix less. Looks like I do not have to worry about keeping properties. Jorge John <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:<(E-Mail Removed)>. .. > On 16 Jul 2003 13:52:59 -0700, (E-Mail Removed) (Jorge Omar) wrote: > > Can you give me some more details on exactly what you are contemplating ? > Something like FX-2 ? > > John |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 17 Jul 2003 05:12:13 -0700, (E-Mail Removed) (Jorge Omar) wrote:
>> Can you give me some more details on exactly what you are contemplating ? >> Something like FX-2 ? > >About 20 yrs ago (in another photo life) I've used the better part of >an HC-110 bottle at a dillution of 1+63 (concentrate) plus carbonate >(1g/L) and benzotriazole (1cc/L of 1% solution). > >I'm testing TMX with this soup (it becomes kind of compensating) to >see if I can tame blown higlights. Highlight contrast is mostly effected by the length of the development and to a lesser extent the activity level of the developer. Dilute your working solution a little more (1:74) and/or shorten your development time in 5% increments until you get the contrast under control. >The reason for the question is if carb solution keeps a short time, I >would mix less. > >Looks like I do not have to worry about keeping properties. No, you don't. John |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks, John.
I will start by lowering dev time (first test was 8 min @20C). Jorge John <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:<(E-Mail Removed)>. .. > On 17 Jul 2003 05:12:13 -0700, (E-Mail Removed) (Jorge Omar) wrote: > > >> Can you give me some more details on exactly what you are contemplating ? > >> Something like FX-2 ? > > > >About 20 yrs ago (in another photo life) I've used the better part of > >an HC-110 bottle at a dillution of 1+63 (concentrate) plus carbonate > >(1g/L) and benzotriazole (1cc/L of 1% solution). > > > >I'm testing TMX with this soup (it becomes kind of compensating) to > >see if I can tame blown higlights. > > Highlight contrast is mostly effected by the length of the development and > to a lesser extent the activity level of the developer. Dilute your working > solution a little more (1:74) and/or shorten your development time in 5% > increments until you get the contrast under control. > > >The reason for the question is if carb solution keeps a short time, I > >would mix less. > > > >Looks like I do not have to worry about keeping properties. > > No, you don't. > > John |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jorge Omar" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed) om... > If one split a developer in active part/carbonate, for how long will > the carbonate solution keep (normal usage - bottle starts full and > goes empty with usage). > I understand that slowly carbonate will become bicarbonate. > Would adding sulphite help? Does it changes pH? > > Thanks, > > Jorge Sodium Carbonate slowly absorbs carbon dioxide from the air which lowers its pH. However, this is a slow process and for a strong concentration of carbonate in a closed container I think is not a practical problem. I think such a solution will keep for many months, perhaps much longer. -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA (E-Mail Removed) |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:49:00 -0700, "Richard Knoppow" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote: > Sodium Carbonate slowly absorbs carbon dioxide from the >air which lowers its pH. However, this is a slow process and >for a strong concentration of carbonate in a closed >container I think is not a practical problem. I think such a >solution will keep for many months, perhaps much longer. Richard, Do you remember anything about carbonate affecting the glass ? I have a vague memory of seeing glass "frosted" by carbonate stock after it had sat for some time on the shelf. John |
![]() |
| Tags |
| carbonate, long, sodium, solution |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|