MD mount lenzes (and Minolta XD5)

Discussion in 'Minolta' started by news.virginmedia.com, Jan 28, 2009.

  1. I realize that they have little value now but do not just want to chuck them
    into the skip. I would rather give them away to someone who could still make
    use of them. Any suggestions?

    divoch
     
    news.virginmedia.com, Jan 28, 2009
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. news.virginmedia.com

    Bruce Guest

    "news.virginmedia.com" <> wrote:

    >I realize that they have little value now but do not just want to chuck them
    >into the skip. I would rather give them away to someone who could still make
    >use of them. Any suggestions?



    Get in touch with a local college that does photography classes, and
    offer them to the students. Most (but by no means all) colleges still
    expect students to learn using film cameras.
     
    Bruce, Jan 28, 2009
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. news.virginmedia.com

    Rob Morley Guest

    On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:12:31 +0000
    Bruce <> wrote:

    > "news.virginmedia.com" <> wrote:
    >
    > >I realize that they have little value now but do not just want to
    > >chuck them into the skip. I would rather give them away to someone
    > >who could still make use of them. Any suggestions?

    >
    >
    > Get in touch with a local college that does photography classes, and
    > offer them to the students. Most (but by no means all) colleges still
    > expect students to learn using film cameras.
    >

    City and Guilds no longer offers qualifications in wet photography.
    There was a good exhibition by art students at the local college last
    year, but that was shot with cameras they'd made themselves - try doing
    that with digital. :)
     
    Rob Morley, Jan 29, 2009
    #3
  4. news.virginmedia.com

    Rob Morley Guest

    On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:27:04 -0000
    "news.virginmedia.com" <> wrote:

    > I realize that they have little value now but do not just want to
    > chuck them into the skip. I would rather give them away to someone
    > who could still make use of them. Any suggestions?
    >

    Don't chuck them - some of us are still using film, even buying
    obsolete junk - er ... classics - on eBay (although the postage can
    cost more than the cameras). My SO graduated a while ago from a point &
    shoot digital to one with manual controls. She fancied having a go
    with film so bought a Praktica kit the other day (it should be OK, her
    reasoning went, because I have some Prakticas). I think she was a bit
    surprised/intimidated by the manual-everything and considerable weight.
    She'd probably appreciate something as advanced as an XD5. :)
     
    Rob Morley, Jan 29, 2009
    #4
  5. news.virginmedia.com <> was inspired to say
    >I realize that they have little value now but do not just want to chuck them
    >into the skip. I would rather give them away to someone who could still make
    >use of them. Any suggestions?


    There is considerable excitement in some circles, as the new Panasonic
    G1 can, with adaptors, accommodate virtually any lens from the past 50
    years. Manual focus, of course, but if the lenses have any quality, they
    may be worth a few bob.

    I'm not a Minolta user so don't know the differences.

    Mike

    --
    Michael J Davis
    <Please note that the Reply-To: address will remain in use for at least 30
    days, but the sender and from addresses are not valid.>
    <><
     
    Michael J Davis, Jan 29, 2009
    #5
  6. news.virginmedia.com

    John Guest

    I bought an adaptor on ebay so I could use my Minolta lens's on my Canon
    camera. Works great in aperture priority mode.

    My 50mm 1.2 became somewhere between a 50mm 1.4 and a 1.5.

    You also have to use manual focus.

    John.

    "news.virginmedia.com" <> wrote in message
    news:9b4gl.212517$2...
    >I realize that they have little value now but do not just want to chuck
    >them into the skip. I would rather give them away to someone who could
    >still make use of them. Any suggestions?
    >
    > divoch
    >
     
    John, Jan 29, 2009
    #6
  7. John <> was inspired to say
    >I bought an adaptor on ebay so I could use my Minolta lens's on my Canon
    >camera. Works great in aperture priority mode.
    >
    >My 50mm 1.2 became somewhere between a 50mm 1.4 and a 1.5.


    Eh?

    Mike

    --
    Michael J Davis
    <Please note that the Reply-To: address will remain in use for at least 30
    days, but the sender and from addresses are not valid.>
    <><
     
    Michael J Davis, Jan 29, 2009
    #7
  8. news.virginmedia.com

    John Guest

    "Michael J Davis" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > John <> was inspired to say
    >>I bought an adaptor on ebay so I could use my Minolta lens's on my Canon
    >>camera. Works great in aperture priority mode.
    >>
    >>My 50mm 1.2 became somewhere between a 50mm 1.4 and a 1.5.

    >
    > Eh?
    >

    You loose a bit though the adaptor. The images come out a little bit darker.
    I open up 1 stop to compensate.

    John.
     
    John, Jan 30, 2009
    #8
  9. John <> was inspired to say
    >
    >"Michael J Davis" <> wrote in message
    >news:...
    >> John <> was inspired to say
    >>>I bought an adaptor on ebay so I could use my Minolta lens's on my Canon
    >>>camera. Works great in aperture priority mode.
    >>>
    >>>My 50mm 1.2 became somewhere between a 50mm 1.4 and a 1.5.

    >>
    >> Eh?
    >>

    >You loose a bit though the adaptor. The images come out a little bit darker.
    >I open up 1 stop to compensate.


    You mean the adaptor has *glass* in it? (i.e. like a telephoto
    adaptor.)

    Otherwise the light collecting ability of the lens is the same
    regardless of the camera used.

    If the images come out darker, it's more likely to be sensitivity /
    calibration differences between the cameras. IMHO of course.

    Mike

    --
    Michael J Davis
    <Please note that the Reply-To: address will remain in use for at least 30
    days, but the sender and from addresses are not valid.>
    <><
     
    Michael J Davis, Jan 30, 2009
    #9
  10. news.virginmedia.com

    Bruce Guest

    Michael J Davis <> wrote:

    >John <> was inspired to say
    >>
    >>"Michael J Davis" <> wrote in message
    >>news:...
    >>> John <> was inspired to say
    >>>>I bought an adaptor on ebay so I could use my Minolta lens's on my Canon
    >>>>camera. Works great in aperture priority mode.
    >>>>
    >>>>My 50mm 1.2 became somewhere between a 50mm 1.4 and a 1.5.
    >>>
    >>> Eh?
    >>>

    >>You loose a bit though the adaptor. The images come out a little bit darker.
    >>I open up 1 stop to compensate.

    >
    >You mean the adaptor has *glass* in it? (i.e. like a telephoto
    >adaptor.)
    >
    >Otherwise the light collecting ability of the lens is the same
    >regardless of the camera used.
    >
    >If the images come out darker, it's more likely to be sensitivity /
    >calibration differences between the cameras. IMHO of course.



    The adaptor has to have a glass element in it otherwise it would be
    impossible to obtain anywhere near infinity focus. The lens would be
    good for macro work only.

    That's because of the difference in register between Minolta MD and
    Canon EF lenses. Canon EF has one of the shorter registers, which is
    why you can fit so many different types of lenses to it with an adapter.
    For example, I use Contax/Yashica, Nikon AIS and AF, Pentax K and M42
    mount lenses on my Canon 5D bodies. They all give correct infinity
    focus, and none of the adapters needs a glass element.

    Not only do adapters with a glass element reduce the light coming
    through the lens, but they make the focal length longer, typically by a
    factor of 1.2 or 1.3. What is worse is that they significantly degrade
    image quality; the effect is far worse than an average teleconverter.

    So using Minolta MD lenses on a Canon EOS body would be pretty
    pointless.

    On the other hand, the MD mount's short register would not prevent an
    adapter being manufactured to fit them to a Four Thirds DSLR, let along
    the Micro Four Thirds Panasonic G1 which has an even shorter register.

    Leica M lenses have an even shorter register than Minolta MD, and an
    adapter is already available to fit them to the Micro Four Thirds mount.
    But I doubt there is much demand for a Minolta MD adapter.

    The best route might be to have an adapter specially made by SRB-Griturn
    of Luton, who specialise in such things. Their prices are surprisingly
    reasonable:

    http://www.srbfilm.co.uk/
     
    Bruce, Jan 30, 2009
    #10
  11. Bruce <> was inspired to say
    >Michael J Davis <> wrote:
    >
    >>John <> was inspired to say
    >>>
    >>>"Michael J Davis" <> wrote in message
    >>>news:...
    >>>> John <> was inspired to say
    >>>>>I bought an adaptor on ebay so I could use my Minolta lens's on my Canon
    >>>>>camera. Works great in aperture priority mode.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>My 50mm 1.2 became somewhere between a 50mm 1.4 and a 1.5.
    >>>>
    >>>> Eh?
    >>>>
    >>>You loose a bit though the adaptor. The images come out a little bit darker.
    >>>I open up 1 stop to compensate.

    >>
    >>You mean the adaptor has *glass* in it? (i.e. like a telephoto
    >>adaptor.)
    >>
    >>Otherwise the light collecting ability of the lens is the same
    >>regardless of the camera used.
    >>
    >>If the images come out darker, it's more likely to be sensitivity /
    >>calibration differences between the cameras. IMHO of course.

    >
    >
    >The adaptor has to have a glass element in it otherwise it would be
    >impossible to obtain anywhere near infinity focus. The lens would be
    >good for macro work only.


    Ah! I see.
    >
    >That's because of the difference in register between Minolta MD and
    >Canon EF lenses. Canon EF has one of the shorter registers, which is
    >why you can fit so many different types of lenses to it with an adapter.
    >For example, I use Contax/Yashica, Nikon AIS and AF, Pentax K and M42
    >mount lenses on my Canon 5D bodies. They all give correct infinity
    >focus, and none of the adapters needs a glass element.


    Yes, that's what I was thinking...
    >
    >Not only do adapters with a glass element reduce the light coming
    >through the lens, but they make the focal length longer, typically by a
    >factor of 1.2 or 1.3. What is worse is that they significantly degrade
    >image quality; the effect is far worse than an average teleconverter.


    I'm amazed anyone bothers, then!

    >So using Minolta MD lenses on a Canon EOS body would be pretty
    >pointless.
    >
    >On the other hand, the MD mount's short register would not prevent an
    >adapter being manufactured to fit them to a Four Thirds DSLR, let along
    >the Micro Four Thirds Panasonic G1 which has an even shorter register.
    >
    >Leica M lenses have an even shorter register than Minolta MD, and an
    >adapter is already available to fit them to the Micro Four Thirds mount.
    >But I doubt there is much demand for a Minolta MD adapter.


    Yes.

    >The best route might be to have an adapter specially made by SRB-Griturn
    >of Luton, who specialise in such things. Their prices are surprisingly
    >reasonable:
    >
    >http://www.srbfilm.co.uk/


    Noted for future use. Ta!

    Thanks for the information, I am now better informed!

    Mike

    --
    Michael J Davis
    <Please note that the Reply-To: address will remain in use for at least 30
    days, but the sender and from addresses are not valid.>
    <><
     
    Michael J Davis, Jan 30, 2009
    #11
  12. news.virginmedia.com

    Bruce Guest

    Michael J Davis <> wrote:
    >
    >Thanks for the information, I am now better informed!



    It's a pleasure. :)
     
    Bruce, Jan 31, 2009
    #12
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Tim Fecker

    Minolta Maxxum Lens Mount

    Tim Fecker, Jul 29, 2003, in forum: Minolta
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    312
    Alan Browne
    Jul 29, 2003
  2. Tim Fecker

    Minolta Maxxum Lens Mount

    Tim Fecker, Jul 30, 2003, in forum: Minolta
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    269
    Alan Browne
    Jul 30, 2003
  3. Theo
    Replies:
    7
    Views:
    1,726
    Jeremy
    Dec 4, 2004
  4. Replies:
    0
    Views:
    401
  5. Replies:
    1
    Views:
    523
    Stan Beck
    Aug 9, 2006
Loading...

Share This Page