Minolta question: Sigma 400mm f/5.6 versus Minolta APO 200mm f/2.8 and 2x APO converter

Discussion in 'Minolta' started by Hamilton Davidson, Jan 17, 2005.

  1. Greetings.

    Hopefully this question can be answered by a fellow Minolta nut or
    anyone else with broad knowledge of apochromatic lenses versus the
    standard ones.

    I have a Minolta 7xi film camera, but I also have an RD-175 digital
    which uses the same Maxxum lenses (and I plan to buy the new D7 which
    also is designed for these lenses).

    (For background, the RD-175 body features a lens element that reduces
    the magnification factor to around 1.25x, whereas the D7 will
    experience a full 1.5x magnification between the lens image and sensor

    I currently have a Sigma 400mm f/5.6 lens which produces very
    acceptable results.

    Today I found a pair of lovely used items at a local camera shop. One
    is a Minolta APO 2x Teleconverter-II. The other is a matching Minolta
    High-Speed AF APO 200mm lens (from their family of high-quality,
    white-bodied gigantic lenses).

    I bought the converter and am deeply interested in the lens.

    On paper, the duo will match the specs of my existing Sigma lens
    (400mm total magnification at f/5.6 due to the 2x conversion).

    But will the Minolta APO pair still have a significant edge over the
    Sigma in terms of overall quality in most conditions? Apparently the
    focusing is quite speedy on the stubby APO, too.

    The price on these seems to be right -- $139 Cdn. ($110 US) for the
    teleconverter and $499 Cdn. ($400 US) for the lens. So I'm sure the
    teleconverter was a good purchase. I'm just wondering if many people
    would consider the quality of the Minolta lens to be a reasonable gain
    for that expense.

    I have a 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6 Maxxum xi lens, so I've already got the
    200mm focal length covered, but the APO would obviously be much, much

    I will then need to decide whether to (a) sell the Sigma to offset the
    purchase price of the 200mm APO or (b) keep it for those few occasions
    when light is sufficient to couple it with the 2x for an 800mm f/11.6

    Thanks in advance for any opinions offered!


    P.S. -- now all I need is a Maxxum 50mm f/1.4!!! Anybody need an
    RD3000 with three lenses, to help pay for the adoption of a D7? Heh
    Hamilton Davidson, Jan 17, 2005
    1. Advertisements

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Robert Meyers
    Jan 9, 2004
  2. Yep

    Sigma AF 135-400mm F4.5-5.6 APO

    Yep, May 18, 2005, in forum: Australia Photography
    paul the 2nd
    May 20, 2005
  3. david

    Sigma AF 80-400mm F4.5-5.6 EX APO OS Lens

    david, Apr 20, 2005, in forum: UK Photography
    Dennis Bradley
    Apr 20, 2005
  4. Black Nikon

    experience with Sigma 80-400mm F4.5-5.6 EX OS APO?

    Black Nikon, Jul 12, 2005, in forum: Digital Cameras
    Dirty Harry
    Jul 13, 2005
  5. Advid

    Old Sigma 400mm 5.6 (non apo)

    Advid, Apr 1, 2006, in forum: Digital Cameras