tranny scanner?

Discussion in 'Amateur Video Production' started by ushere, Mar 2, 2012.

  1. ushere

    ushere Guest

    no, not that sort of trannie ;-)

    anyone care to recount experiences please.

    have over 1000 to scan ;-(
     
    ushere, Mar 2, 2012
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. ushere <> writes:

    > no, not that sort of trannie ;-)
    >
    > anyone care to recount experiences please.
    >
    > have over 1000 to scan ;-(


    Good that your scanning problem is only a small one. On another forum
    one person starting a 70,000 photo sort-and-scan project (actual
    scanning will be a lot fewer than that of course) was comforted by
    another who's well into a 500,000 photo scanning project -- and has a
    second one waiting when this one is done :).

    Transparencies are hard; they have high maximum density, so they need a
    scanner with a good DMAX rating.

    There are basically three levels of scanner:

    Flatbed scanners with transparency adapters (including good ones like
    the Epson V750).

    "Prosumer" dedicated film scanners, which are mostly not made any more.
    Nikon Coolscan 5000 ED or 9000 are examples (35mm and medium format).

    Full-out professional scanners, like old drum scanners and the modern
    Imacon models.

    If your needs are at all serious, the first level won't give you
    satisfactory results from 35mm originals (you haven't said what size
    you've got; that mostly means 35mm, but doesn't always).

    ICE or equivalent infrared scan channel based defect fixing will HUGELY
    ease your job, unless the originals are in exemplary condition.

    There's also "camera scanning"; setting up a slide stage with lighting
    behind it, and photograping the originals with a macro lens and high-res
    digital camera. This is very fast, but takes quite a lot of work to get
    just right (alignment of camera to slide, holding the film flat, getting
    the lighting exactly even, and so forth). This is much faster.
    --
    David Dyer-Bennet, ; http://dd-b.net/
    Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/
    Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/
    Dragaera: http://dragaera.info
     
    David Dyer-Bennet, Mar 2, 2012
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. ushere

    ushere Guest

    On 3/03/2012 1:56 AM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
    > ushere<> writes:
    >
    >> no, not that sort of trannie ;-)
    >>
    >> anyone care to recount experiences please.
    >>
    >> have over 1000 to scan ;-(

    >
    > Good that your scanning problem is only a small one. On another forum
    > one person starting a 70,000 photo sort-and-scan project (actual
    > scanning will be a lot fewer than that of course) was comforted by
    > another who's well into a 500,000 photo scanning project -- and has a
    > second one waiting when this one is done :).
    >
    > Transparencies are hard; they have high maximum density, so they need a
    > scanner with a good DMAX rating.
    >
    > There are basically three levels of scanner:
    >
    > Flatbed scanners with transparency adapters (including good ones like
    > the Epson V750).
    >
    > "Prosumer" dedicated film scanners, which are mostly not made any more.
    > Nikon Coolscan 5000 ED or 9000 are examples (35mm and medium format).
    >
    > Full-out professional scanners, like old drum scanners and the modern
    > Imacon models.
    >
    > If your needs are at all serious, the first level won't give you
    > satisfactory results from 35mm originals (you haven't said what size
    > you've got; that mostly means 35mm, but doesn't always).
    >
    > ICE or equivalent infrared scan channel based defect fixing will HUGELY
    > ease your job, unless the originals are in exemplary condition.
    >
    > There's also "camera scanning"; setting up a slide stage with lighting
    > behind it, and photograping the originals with a macro lens and high-res
    > digital camera. This is very fast, but takes quite a lot of work to get
    > just right (alignment of camera to slide, holding the film flat, getting
    > the lighting exactly even, and so forth). This is much faster.


    thanks david, most informative.

    you're right they are 35mm, though there were quite a few med and large
    format that we had done prof. (my wife's an artist of over 40 years, and
    travelled extensively round the world). when i wrote over 1000 i am
    being VERY conservative ;-(

    i've done a few 100 with my canon 5600 - takes forever at full res but
    results are acceptable for her needs.

    i think, as i suspected, i'll just have to find an old prosumer one.
     
    ushere, Mar 2, 2012
    #3
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Radu
    Replies:
    7
    Views:
    745
    Rob Novak
    Aug 15, 2005
  2. headrippa
    Replies:
    9
    Views:
    1,832
  3. Dave E

    Sydney, northern side - tranny processing

    Dave E, Jul 28, 2006, in forum: Australia Photography
    Replies:
    8
    Views:
    308
    Noons
    Jul 28, 2006
  4. Josh

    $80,000 scanner vs. $3000 scanner

    Josh, Mar 17, 2005, in forum: Photoshop Tutorials
    Replies:
    10
    Views:
    487
  5. G. Huang
    Replies:
    8
    Views:
    323
    Rafe B.
    Jan 6, 2004
Loading...

Share This Page