10D VS FUJI S2 Pro

Discussion in 'Fuji' started by LucaPatrone, Feb 9, 2004.

  1. LucaPatrone

    LucaPatrone Guest

    LucaPatrone, Feb 9, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. LucaPatrone

    AArDvarK Guest

    Tell you what, open two web browsers each one
    to: http://www.steves-digicams.com/default.htm
    In one go to the S2pro review, and continue through
    the links to the sample images. In the other browser
    do the same for the 10D, the use both browsers to
    compare the images. Don't read the reviews just go
    straight to the samples and you can then decide for
    yourself. I think the Canon 10D image are superior,
    there is a lot of noise in the darker areas of the Fuji,
    and at high ISO settings. Canon shots are cleaner in
    all respects, and the color, just fine. Maybe if the
    Fuji colors are a touch better it wouldn't take but a
    touch of work to make the Canon images just as good.

    After that, you should do a camera features
    comparison at:
    http://www.dpreview.com/ buying guide link
    or
    http://www.imaging-resource.com/
    in the "comparometer" link.

    Color is easy, clean detail much more important.
    I do not own either camera, but I would pick the
    Canon much sooner, and not the S2pro if I had
    a slew of Nikkors ...
     
    AArDvarK, Feb 9, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Both are terrily artifact ridden and blurry. Simple old-style Bayers.
     
    George Preddy, Feb 10, 2004
    #3
  4. It's hard to decide which is a worse value, the very overpriced Fuji with
    more aritfacts and slightly less blur that cannot display a useful RAW
    preview, or the very overpriced often unusably blurry Canon 10D. The F717
    is a much better buy that offeres very similar prosumer performance.

    In fact, the D100 is very noisy and not even shoot pri (neither is the
    Fuji). This crop of prosumer DSLRs gives DSLRs a bad name. Don't even
    consider spending money on a DSLR unless it is 10MP+, that leaves 2 pro
    caliber Sigmas, a Canon, and a Kodak. Only Sigma is priced right.
     
    George Preddy, Feb 10, 2004
    #4
  5. LucaPatrone

    Crownfield Guest

    as soon as a real company comes
    out with a colocated sensor chip,
    and fixes the foveon color problems,
    and makes it more than 11 mp spatially unique pixels,
    i'll think about it.

    sigma just is not in the real world of serious cameras.

    note that the first foveon camera
    was a dslr by an obscure camera maker,
    and their second camera
    was by an almost out of business maker of consumer cameras.

    really convincing.

    you are the most 'pro' foveon has gotten,
    and that is just plain embarrassing.
     
    Crownfield, Feb 11, 2004
    #5
  6. LucaPatrone

    John Navas Guest

    [POSTED TO rec.photo.digital - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <> on Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:22:28 -0800, Crownfield
    built by a company that makes toy cameras.
     
    John Navas, Feb 11, 2004
    #6
  7. LucaPatrone

    John Navas Guest

    [POSTED TO rec.photo.digital - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <c0akk3$m0m$> on Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:45:56 +0900, "George
    Sigma doesn't make a 10MP+ DSLR, so its price is irrelevant.
     
    John Navas, Feb 11, 2004
    #7
  8. George Preddy, Feb 11, 2004
    #8
  9. George Preddy, Feb 11, 2004
    #9
  10. George Preddy, Feb 11, 2004
    #10
  11. George Preddy, Feb 11, 2004
    #11
  12. LucaPatrone

    Yer Welcome Guest

    Hey John good to see you here ,[saved my butt many a time with win98]
    keep giving George a bad time [he deserves it]

    thanks
     
    Yer Welcome, Feb 11, 2004
    #12
  13. K-Mart sells Canon DSLRs.
     
    George Preddy, Feb 11, 2004
    #13
  14. LucaPatrone

    AArDvarK Guest

    I highly doubt that George ...
    Alex

     
    AArDvarK, Feb 11, 2004
    #14
  15. Wal-mart too.
     
    George Preddy, Feb 11, 2004
    #15
  16. LucaPatrone

    Crownfield Guest

    read my lips preddy. I'll talk real slow just for you.

    "as soon as a real company comes
    out with a colocated sensor chip".

    there is no choice currently,
    other than a bayer camera
    which has a decent color space.

    if foveon is as good as you say,
    they will come out with a 11 mpx3 24x36 mm sensor,
    which they will correct the color space and the noise,
    and nikon and canon will jump on it.

    I will too.

    confused by the color blocks on the left?
    thats called a grey scale,
    because it is grey.
    bayers can do that.
     
    Crownfield, Feb 12, 2004
    #16
  17. LucaPatrone

    Adam Drew Guest

    We have a 10D at work with the 28-200 lens. All I can say is that it's
    awesome. Easily the best digicam I've ever used.

    Adam
     
    Adam Drew, Feb 12, 2004
    #17
  18. LucaPatrone

    John Navas Guest

    [POSTED TO rec.photo.digital - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <110220042112096958%> on Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:12:09
    Even a stopped clock is right twice a day -- see
    <http://makeashorterlink.com/?N27421467>.
     
    John Navas, Feb 12, 2004
    #18
  19. LucaPatrone

    John Navas Guest

    [POSTED TO rec.photo.digital - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <c0d3n3$ff3$> on Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:15:51 +0900, "George
    I said "built" (which matters), not "sells" (which doesn't), but K-Mart
    doesn't sell Canon DSLRs in any event. (If you disagree, post some real
    proof.)
     
    John Navas, Feb 12, 2004
    #19
  20. LucaPatrone

    John Navas Guest

    [POSTED TO rec.photo.digital - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <c0c7dn$r9e$> on Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:12:57 +0900, "George
    Sigma hype. The camera is actually 3.4 MP.
     
    John Navas, Feb 12, 2004
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.