Discussion in '35mm Cameras' started by Annika1980, Sep 18, 2004.

  1. Annika1980

    Annika1980 Guest

    Annika1980, Sep 18, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  2. Annika1980

    Mark M Guest

    Is it just me, or is that a 6 month old sized head on a 6 year old sized
    Seems way out of proportion...

    Oh, and...
    Give that thing some FOOOOOD!

    I don't see an indication of ISO.
    What did you shoot this at?

    But hey, it was your lunch hour...
    Mark M, Sep 18, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  3. Annika1980

    Annika1980 Guest

    Annika1980, Sep 18, 2004
  4. Annika1980

    Jim Phelps Guest

    Where's the farts?

    I have a 1mb DSL connection and it still took half a minute to download.
    That's a big file...
    Jim Phelps, Sep 18, 2004
  5. Annika1980

    Alan Browne Guest

    Alan Browne, Sep 18, 2004
  6. Annika1980

    Alan Browne Guest

    Why didn't it appear in the EXIF?
    Alan Browne, Sep 18, 2004

  7. Looks pretty good for an unsharpened file Bret.
    Check out this 20D file from controlled lighting ...
    http://www.pbase.com/r_p/image/33834060/original . 'Large' sensor 8MP
    capture is where digital matches 100 ISO 35mm in terms of resolution. Makes
    you wonder what $1500 will buy us in 5 years from now doesn't it
    Simon Stanmore, Sep 18, 2004
  8. Annika1980

    Annika1980 Guest

    What did you shoot this at?
    Apparently the Canon software I used strips this data.
    Annika1980, Sep 18, 2004
  9. Nice shot.

    How big is the RAW file?


    Donald Specker, Sep 18, 2004
  10. Annika1980

    Alan Browne Guest

    Annika1980 wrote:

    Sheesh! Hopefully they'll fix these nits...


    PS: feet dry?
    Alan Browne, Sep 18, 2004
  11. Annika1980

    Alan Browne Guest

    ....amazing fine detail ... could have exposed it a bit lower...

    (Nice to have you back Simon...)
    Alan Browne, Sep 18, 2004
  12. No idea Donald - it's not my shot

    Simon Stanmore, Sep 19, 2004
  13. Strange, the exposure looks spot on to me.
    I've never really been away Alan. I've just not been in the mood for getting
    involved with all the nonsense that's been going on. I suspect that many
    other regulars from days gone by are still ligging around but not posting
    Simon Stanmore, Sep 19, 2004
  14. Annika1980

    Alan Browne Guest

    The sheen in the skin from the light is high. The eyes tell the
    story on that one. (flat on lighting). The skin tone, where not
    directly flat lit does look right, so I retract that.
    I suspected as much.
    Alan Browne, Sep 19, 2004
  15. Annika1980

    m II Guest

    Don't encourage him. Between Photoshop and his feeding beans to the
    starving animals, he's a menace to the animal kingdom.

    m II, Sep 20, 2004
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.