4/3rds users consciously obtuse? DOF

Discussion in 'Digital SLR' started by RichA, Feb 2, 2011.

  1. RichA

    Eric Stevens Guest

    So what? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh

    Please don't come back saying that you already knew that as quite
    obviously you don't.
    Eric Stevens, Feb 3, 2011
    1. Advertisements

  2. RichA

    Schneider Guest

    Proving yet again that you are full of shit and are nothing but a low-life
    crapshooter. (As if your photography was not proof enough.)

    Each lens design and aperture stop diaphragm design produces a unique
    quality to the bokeh created in a photograph.

    I guess you've never seen the OoF areas of an image created by a
    catadioptric lens design either. You fuckingly pathetic and ignorant MORON.

    If only everyone could instantly rid the world of inane ass-holes like you
    who incessantly spew your ignorance and lack of experience across the

    Go commit suicide. You'll be doing the rest of the world a huge favor.
    It'll be the ONLY contribution to photography that you'll ever make in your
    pathetic excuse for a life.
    Schneider, Feb 3, 2011
    1. Advertisements

  3. RichA

    Bowser Guest

    I'd really like to see those results. Then Rob Galbraith can screw them
    up and claim Nikon is better.
    Seriously? Damn, I thought they'd improve the IQ. If that's true, it's a
    forgetaboutit for me. I guess it's now primarily a video cam.
    Bowser, Feb 3, 2011
  4. RichA

    Bowser Guest

    Sparkling personality you've got there. All this, and you've turned down NG?

    Wasn't Schnieder the building janitor on that show "One Day at a Time?"
    Was that you?
    Bowser, Feb 3, 2011
  5. RichA

    George Kerby Guest

    Quite possible, but I would surmise that Tonto is socking himself after the
    vintage Schneider optics company...
    George Kerby, Feb 3, 2011
  6. RichA

    Bowser Guest

    I just noticed today that the GH2 is included for noise comparison at
    the DP Review site. Check the 60D review. It doesn't look as good as the
    60D or the D7000, but it isn't horrible.
    Bowser, Feb 3, 2011
  7. RichA

    Bowser Guest

    No question Schneider is a sock, besides being a asshole. Who is it?
    Bowser, Feb 3, 2011
  8. RichA

    Bruce Guest

    IQ is good at base ISO - the best ever from a Four Thirds sensor - but
    the noise at higher ISOs is a disappointment. I don't think you would
    ever be happy with one because your Canon 5D II has raised your
    expectations very high indeed.

    The GH1 was optimised for video. So is the GH2. That shouldn't be a
    surprise, but like many other people I had hoped that the 16 MP sensor
    would also be something special for still photography. It is, but
    only at base ISO.

    Here in the UK there are many, many unsold GH1 bodies and GH1 kits
    with the 14-140mm lens. We have been offered large stocks of these at
    absurdly low prices to help clear the importer's warehouse.
    Bruce, Feb 3, 2011
  9. RichA

    Savageduck Guest

    "He of many Names", hater of all things DSLR, lover of all things P&S,
    and SuperZoom, and resident of a basement in the frozen wastes of MN.
    Savageduck, Feb 3, 2011
  10. RichA

    Peter N Guest

    MN starts with an "M."
    I wonder if a picture of it would qualify for the SI. A fuzzy moth will.
    Why not the creator of the myth. The photo of It should qualify under
    MN, myth maker, moth shooter, moth creator.

    How about it Bowser?
    Peter N, Feb 4, 2011
  11. RichA

    Bowser Guest

    The moth is in. The committee voted this afternoon.

    Taken with a superzoom?
    Bowser, Feb 4, 2011
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.