A 500mm Pano

Here's a pano done with a 500mm lens and a 10D.
http://www.pbase.com/billyb2/image/24885773



Cody,

http://community-2.webtv.net/AnOvercomer02/PhotographyLinks

 

From:

I found this one more impressive:
http://www.pbase.com/billyb2/image/22809398

I've done a few vertical panos like that, but I really like that one.

 

So...?

Ralf

 

Can tell you are German.

 

Preferred the bridge personally.

 

Oh really? Let me make a guess, too.

With your lack of knowledge about the finer details of European names
and nationalities and your superficial way of judging things, you must
be American.

Ralf

 

Re: A 500mm Pano

Here's a pano done with a 500mm lens and a 10D.

(Ralf R. Radermacher) wrote:
So...?
Ralf
==============================

So I think it's impressive, don't you?



Cody,

http://community-2.webtv.net/AnOvercomer02/PhotographyLinks

 

Well Ralph...
I'm not an American and I recon you are German too.
Perhaps it has something to do with the way you sign your messages? The sig
(incidentally) is in violation of newsgroup etiquette... But you'd expect
that from a German, wouldn't you?

Ryadia

 

What's with all the offensive stereotyping here???

 

So what if the lot of you were wrong?

Lots of exciting news here, tonight. ;-)

Would you mind explaining what's wrong with my signature? Been like this
for years and noone ever complained. I trust you'll be able to point us
to the relevant passage from the charter so we can all look it up.

Ralf

 

Oh, nothing. Just the usual nonsense from a few nutters who think their
passport makes them something better than other people. Never mind.

Ralf

 

From:

What was impressive about it ... the fact that it was done with a 500mm?
The blending could be better.
Oh, I know. It was B&W so it has to be good!

 

You said you "really like that one."
What...did you change your mind?

 

A very nice shot indeed.

 

Well, you have not committed the foul crime of forgeting the ' ' at the
end of the sig separator.

Pete

 

(Annika1980) wrote:
What was impressive about it ... the fact that it was done with a 500mm?
The blending could be better.
Oh, I know. It was B&W so it has to be good!
===============================

What's wrong with the blending? I think the fact that it was done with a
500mm is impressive, It has a really wide look.




Cody,

http://community-2.webtv.net/AnOvercomer02/PhotographyLinks

 

Still mad about losing the war Herr Radermacher?
Did you fight under the Kaiser, or the Furer?
No doubt you are an expert on photographing bridges.

Michael...

 

I liked the vertical pano of the tall trees. The bridge pano was
kinda dull.

 

Look at the areas of sky both above and below the bridge.
Some of the areas are a mess, especially a big dark blob in the sky
to the right of the pic.

Note that the stitching was fine. It was the blending that needed
work. Perhaps thats why he went with B&W?

 

And yet another "intelligent" American who evidently knows a lot about
the World...