All purpose lens (cannon 28-105mm or 28-135mm?)

Discussion in '35mm Cameras' started by sys, Jul 10, 2003.

  1. sys

    sys Guest

    I currently have an EOS 3000N and a 28-90mm lens that came in it's
    kit. I've been advised to get a better lens and was initially thinking
    about getting the cannon 28-105mm lens. However would it be better to
    get a lens with a slightly longer focal length, say the 28-135mm.

    Is there much difference between these two lenses in terms of
    quality/price?

    Thanks in advance

    Andy
     
    sys, Jul 10, 2003
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. sys

    Guest Guest

    I concur with Larry. I shoot regularly with some very high quality FD
    primes, so my standard is reasonably high, and I have no complaints about
    the EF 28-135. It constantly surprises me. And pleasantly, I might add!
    ;-)

    Ken
     
    Guest, Jul 10, 2003
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. sys

    Bob Sull Guest

    They are both good all purpose lenses.

    The 28-105 f/3.5-4.5, the better of the two 28-105s, is about $220US.
    The 28-135 IS is about $400US.

    The difference optically is minimal, both good. For the extra #180US
    for the 28-135 you get the extra 30mm in length, but more important than
    that, you get the Image Stabilizer feature.

    You will have to decide if the length and the IS are worth the extra
    $180US to you.

    BTW, a friend loaned me his 28-135..... I'm thinking I need one!

    Bob
     
    Bob Sull, Jul 11, 2003
    #3
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.