Best developer for fuji neopan 1600 ?

Which developers would the wise folks on this newsgroup recommend for neopan
1600? The aim is to minimise grain (at least somewhat). I've tried T-max, at
24C but this was more grainy than expected. I realise it's going to be
fairly grainy anyway.

Thanks

Ros

 

HC-110 or D-76 will likely give less grain than T-Max, without loss of
speed (though you're actually pushing a little to get Neopan 1600 to
1600; it's properly about 800-1000, but designed with low contrast so it
pushes well). If you can tolerate loss of speed and some loss of
acutance, Microdol-X should significantly reduce grain -- but then you
might as well shoot Tri-X or Neopan 400 and develop in conventional
processes. I've seen claims that shortening process time reduces grain,
other factors equal, which would suggest HC-110, possibly even in
Dilution A, would be the likeliest candidate. Dilution A times are
about 70% of Dilution B, in the likely case you can't find them listed
anywhere. The push to 1600 should still give a time around 4+ minutes;
I wouldn't try to go under 4 minutes for tank development because of
problems with consistency and fill/drain times relative to the total dev
time.

--
I may be a scwewy wabbit, but I'm not going to Alcatwaz!
-- E. J. Fudd, 1954

Donald Qualls, aka The Silent Observer
Lathe Building Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/HomebuiltLathe.htm
Speedway 7x12 Lathe Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/my7x12.htm

Opinions expressed are my own -- take them for what they're worth
and don't expect them to be perfect.

 

Hi,
where can I find developing times with rodinal?

thanks!

On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 03:08:21 GMT, Donald Qualls



---

SHOW
E
LIES
L

 

I strongly recommend Acutol. Try 1+15 for 7.5 minutes @ 20C/68F. It's
a VERY fine-grained film when developed properly. Expose at about EI
650-800.

 

I strongly recommend Acutol. Try 1+15 for 7.5 minutes @ 20C/68F. It's
a VERY fine-grained film when developed properly. Expose at about EI
650-800. Here's an example:

http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1225120

 

Try on digitaltruth. I remember they are very short, about 3.5 minutes
in 1+50 diluition.

 

Isn't too much short?
tnx !

ciao

---

SHOW
E
LIES
L

 

I was wrong, actually it is 5 minutes at 1+25 or 8 at 1+50. I was
mislead by the time for some other developer.

 

Start with:

http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.html

--
I may be a scwewy wabbit, but I'm not going to Alcatwaz!
-- E. J. Fudd, 1954

Donald Qualls, aka The Silent Observer
Lathe Building Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/HomebuiltLathe.htm
Speedway 7x12 Lathe Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/my7x12.htm

Opinions expressed are my own -- take them for what they're worth
and don't expect them to be perfect.

 

thank you !!


---

SHOW
E
LIES
L

 

Hallo !

In my opinion the best is XTOL 1+3 for Neopan [email protected] ... I use it for
Neopan [email protected] also. Times from www.digitaltruth.com


Regards
wkg
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=56107

 

It would be difficult to find a developer less suited for Neopan 1600
than Rodinal. Worst possible choice.

 

Your opinion, of course -- and while it might even be correct (though I
admit, with some subject matter grain doesn't bother me), that wasn't
the question asked. Maybe the original poster wanted to find out if he
*liked* the look? Or see it, to know what kind of subject matter it
might suit? Or perhaps he has some time critical images, and *only* has
Rodinal available in the time frame he's working in, and something with
ugly grain is better than undeveloped film?

--
I may be a scwewy wabbit, but I'm not going to Alcatwaz!
-- E. J. Fudd, 1954

Donald Qualls, aka The Silent Observer
Lathe Building Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/HomebuiltLathe.htm
Speedway 7x12 Lathe Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/my7x12.htm

Opinions expressed are my own -- take them for what they're worth
and don't expect them to be perfect.

 

The original question was 'Which developers would the wise folks on
this newsgroup recommend for neopan 1600? The aim is to minimise grain
(at least somewhat).'

Given that stated desire, Rodinal is the worst choice.

 

Even then, I doubt Rodinal is any worse than Dektol (which most
assuredly has been used as a film developer, though perhaps before your
time), and probably no worse than Caffenol (which last would also have
the advantage of giving a true speed of about 1250 instead of 1000, with
out pushing at all).

But while Rodinal is a poor choice (with any film) for minimizing grain,
your statement above was sufficiently general as to sound like Rodinal
was completely unsuitable for Neopan 1600 in any application -- which is
manifestly not the case; Rodinal will do a fine job at EI 800, if you
don't mind grain.

--
I may be a scwewy wabbit, but I'm not going to Alcatwaz!
-- E. J. Fudd, 1954

Donald Qualls, aka The Silent Observer
Lathe Building Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/HomebuiltLathe.htm
Speedway 7x12 Lathe Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/my7x12.htm

Opinions expressed are my own -- take them for what they're worth
and don't expect them to be perfect.

 

Rodinal is a poor choice for Neopan 1600 for the following reasons:

1. Rodinal does not achieve full emulsion speed. Presumably the Neopan
1600 is being used because of the need for a very fast films. Using
Rodinal would run counter to that because of its lack of
speed-enhancing properties.

2. The poster explicitly wants to keep graininess to a minimum.

On both counts, Acutol does an outstanding job. Acutol enhances speed
and does not exaggerate graininess. Rodinal loses speed and
exaggerates graininess.

 

It's all about taste. Some like texture some don't. I have a
shot around where I should some Kodak Gold 1600 about 12 years ago. I
used a Soligor (!!) 70~210 f/3.5 zoom and 2 of the cheapest doublers
you've ever seen. It worked quite well to make "atmospheric" shots. A
lot like the P3200 used in

http://www.darkroompro.com/images/photos/3_despair.jpg

Shot with a Minolta X700 at 1/60th and f/5.6 in a dark alley.


Regards,

John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.darkroompro.com
Please remove the "_" when replying via email

 

Neopan 1600 is my most used favorite film and I do the same.
In XTOL 1+3 it looks like normally developed medium speed film. Way better
than tri x in D76 1:1. Sharper and less grain. I hate to overstate it but
it's a dream come true for someone who's been doing this since 1965.

Mark Rabiner
Photography
Portland Oregon
http://rabinergroup.com/

 

clayton f76 works really well actually.
the neopan 1600 works best if you expose it perfectly.
a little under or a little over and you'll see a lot of grain.