Blue Ridge Mountain photos

Discussion in 'Digital Cameras' started by beachpirate2, Oct 20, 2003.

  1. beachpirate2

    beachpirate2 Guest

    beachpirate2, Oct 20, 2003
    1. Advertisements

  2. beachpirate2

    ajacobs2 Guest

    Hmmmm, I see Ridges and Blue.. Kinda like life passed over it, around it
    and away from it.......
    ajacobs2, Oct 20, 2003
    1. Advertisements

  3. beachpirate2

    Bill Guest

    I like # 1956. Composition is very pleasing to me.
    Bill, Oct 20, 2003
  4. beachpirate2

    Val Sharp Guest

    HavingFun, on 20/10/03 19:36, wrote:

    Aye. You definitely need a way in to the photos, but often there is a
    barrier of trees or bushes in the foreground. 1944 has some depth
    because there's a route into the picture that leads between the
    foreground and background. And of course there's 1956, which leads one
    in a long way. As opposed to 1957, which rather quickly leads one out
    of the LH edge of the photo.

    Mind you, 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1999 have some nice contrasts - though
    I think 1995 has the edge as far as composition is concerned.

    Some of the more pastoral photos are a bit half and half, split
    through the middle, which often isn't nearly as interesting as
    something more off-centre.

    The bushes in 1966 frame the composition quite well.

    The errors are one's I make myself, but it's easier to spot them in
    other people's photos :)

    Looks like you had a lovely day ... but it's disconcerting ... where's
    the sea? ;-)
    Val Sharp, Oct 21, 2003
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.