But can most Nikon and Sony lenses do it justice?

Discussion in 'Digital SLR' started by RichA, Jan 13, 2011.

  1. RichA

    Savageduck Guest

    My Epson driver for my US Epson R2880 shows it as Super B (13 x 19) &
    A3+ (13 x 19).
    My Canon i9900 only shows it as A3+ (13 x19), no Super B with the Canon driver.
    Savageduck, Jan 15, 2011
    1. Advertisements

  2. RichA

    Alan Browne Guest


    My 13x19" setting was set up by me on my Epson driver.
    Alan Browne, Jan 15, 2011
    1. Advertisements

  3. RichA

    Savageduck Guest

    I just reconfirmed and Apple just updated the Epson drivers for OSX 10.6.6;
    I have Epson, Super B (13 x 19) & A3+

    Canon A3+

    My Red River paper only lists size at 13 x 19.
    I have a Canon Photo Paper Pro packed with two sheets remaining and
    that shows A3+/13"x19". It has an additional label showing the
    dimension differences between A3 & A3+, A3 shown as 297mm x 420mm & A3+
    as 329mm x 483mm.
    Savageduck, Jan 15, 2011
  4. RichA

    Paul Furman Guest

    I can't do borderless prints on custom user defined sheet sizes, only
    the default standard ones. This is an Epson R1800.
    Paul Furman, Jan 15, 2011
  5. RichA

    peter Guest

    I take small crops from my and blow them up.
    BTW not all of us stick to 13x19.
    peter, Jan 19, 2011
  6. RichA

    Savageduck Guest

    True, I print many more 5x7, 8x10, & 11x17. 13x19 is my extreme max for
    home print size.
    Sometimes that might be done with a crop from the original file and
    resized. However the final quality of an up-sized print from a crop is
    going to depend of quite a few different factors. You have to be quite
    selective in choosing which crops are worthy of up-sizing, or are best
    left at 4x6, or 5x7, and might even be pushing things at 8x10.

    That is when software such as Genuine Fractals becomes valuable.
    Savageduck, Jan 19, 2011
  7. RichA

    peter Guest

    I hope this doesn't start a holy war. Do you think GF produces a better
    image than CS5?
    I have not seen any difference in the results.
    peter, Jan 19, 2011
  8. RichA

    Savageduck Guest

    I think GF, which is now Perfect Resize 7, has a better algorithm for
    resizing enlargement of greater than 200% than CS5.
    CS5 is just fine for most of us, but if I were to make a serious/severe
    crop and wanted to have a "large" print GF/Perfect Resize is probably
    the better way to go to get a decent result.

    As a stand alone app it is a bit pricy, it is much more appealing when
    bundled in OnOne's Photo Suite of plug-ins.
    < http://www.ononesoftware.com/products/perfect-resize/ >
    Savageduck, Jan 19, 2011
  9. RichA

    peter Guest


    I had tried it a few years ago, but saw no real advantage. I will give
    it a shot and see if it works better for me.
    peter, Jan 20, 2011
  10. RichA

    Paul Furman Guest

    I bought a couple rolls of 13" wide paper and have enjoyed doing some
    prints in a longer format with 16:9 ratio like HD video. It sure is a
    hassle cutting those sheets though and my Epson R1800 is the most
    finicky thing about feeding paper - especially if it's curled! Argh.
    Paul Furman, Jan 20, 2011
  11. RichA

    peter Guest

    I know what you mean. The problem becomes worse as you get near the end
    of the roll.
    peter, Jan 21, 2011
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.