Can any ultra-zooms shoot continually without keeping your finger on button?

Discussion in 'Digital Cameras' started by HS Crow, Sep 15, 2005.

  1. HS Crow

    HS Crow Guest

    I'm looking to buy my first camera, a compact digital ultra-zoom for a
    particular task. I would like to be able to take sequences of 30-90
    shots by only depressing the shutter release button once. I don't
    care what mode this is called on the camera, be it continuous, time
    lapse or whatever, but it needs to be able to do the following:

    Shoot 30 to 90 shots consecutively without user interaction once
    shutter release button has been pressed. If using a time lapse
    function, then the gap between shots needs to be able to be set as low
    as 10 seconds or less. Be able to do this in manual mode with shutter
    speeds as high as 15+ seconds and preferably manual focussing.
    The optical zoom should ideally be 10X+ or alternatively the camera is
    able to take an optional tele-convertor which takes it up to 10X+.
    3 megapixels or more.

    IR Remote Control or wired shutter release function.
    Time lapse function, 1-100 shots with gaps of 1-60 minutes.

    The only camera that seems to fit the bill is the Kodak P850, which is
    just released or about to be released, so there are no reviews.

    I'm been looking at the Canon Powershot S1 & Olympus C770 as they are
    IR remote compatible. The S1 has a time lapse function which while
    useful, doesn't allow the time delay to be set below 1 minute.

    Anybody have any ideas? Id prefer to keep the price below ~$500

    HS Crow, Sep 15, 2005
    1. Advertisements

  2. Can't think of one, sorry. Something with a threaded cable release socket
    (Sony S9000, for example) migh do it, as you could simply use a locking
    release and let it keep going, but I don't know about it's framerate or
    buffer size. I was going to suggest simply using a camcorder and using
    screen grabs, but the closest to the resolution you'd need would be a HDTV
    one like Sony's HDR-HC1, and that's way out of your stated range.

    Martin Francis, Sep 15, 2005
    1. Advertisements

  3. HS Crow

    HS Crow Guest

    I've been thinking along the same lines and had considered the Sony's
    HDR-HC1 as I'd like to get a HD camcorder relatively soon. Two things
    put me off the Sony;
    Firstly, it's 1080i rather than 720p. Working with 1080i just seems
    out of the question at the moment, whereas 720p seems achievable.
    Secondly, I don't imagine that the image quality is going to be great
    with any HD camcorder when taking stills. Also, I need the
    flexibility of taking long exposures which I can't imagine that the
    HDR-HC1 offers. I'd be happy with a 720p camcorder for $1600,
    provided it offers all that I reasonably expect. Although, I couldn't
    afford that for a while and I'd like to start shooting stills soon.
    Back to the drawing board.

    Lastly, the Panasonic FZ30 looks promising, but the price is about 50%
    more than I'd like to pay. It can shoot wide-screen aspect ratio,
    which would be useful, as I'd like to mix HD video with stills. That
    would save a lot of future cropping with those large sequences of
    shots that I'm taking.
    HS Crow, Sep 16, 2005
  4. Marvin wrote:
    The Nikon range offer an "ultra-high-speed" setting where, on the Coolpix
    8400 for example) you can take up to 100 shots at 30 fps. That's with VGA
    resolution. For more resolution, you can use multi-shot 16 where you get
    16 consecutive pictures 816 x 612 pixels taken at about 1.6fps.

    David J Taylor, Sep 16, 2005
  5. HS Crow

    HS Crow Guest

    Thanks Roger, that sounds like the sort of flexibility that I would

    Quite a lot of cameras in my price range can shoot 30 fps video @ VGA
    resolution, but I haven't come across a camera that will shoot 30
    stills per second in VGA.
    I'm surprised by all the different modes that get sneaked into a
    company's products!
    Unfortunately, the 8400 has much too low an optical zoom for my needs.
    But, I'll check out their other models for similar functionality. Even
    though I wasn't specifically looking for such a high fps for stills,
    it's an interesting feature. Although, the resolution is too low to
    be of much use to me…
    I just checked and the 8800 has the same feature but with a 10X zoom,
    8 Mp and rather a high price :( They both also come with a remote
    control and an interval timer feature, although the timer has a
    minimum setting of 30 seconds.

    I do see to be looking for features that many cameras come close to
    matching but don't quite make it. I think many cameras have the
    technological potential to do what I'm after, but the features just
    haven't been implemented in the way that serves my needs.

    I think I'm going to order a Canon Powershot S1 tomorrow, along with
    the optional remote. It doesn't cover all my needs, but it's cheap
    enough that I could buy a second camera next year to cover other
    areas. It's dawning on me that it's hard to find one camera that does
    everything that I want. Harems are starting to make even more sense
    :) Also, the S1 has an optional water proof case that opens up some
    interesting possibilities. So I've gone back to my second choice
    camera, but I've learnt a lot in following the buying process through.
    HS Crow, Sep 16, 2005
  6. HS Crow wrote:
    Glad the information was of help. I believe that 8800 may be discontinued
    and therefore available at much lower prices.

    David J Taylor, Sep 17, 2005
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.