Can you say old?... (GBF)

Discussion in '35mm Cameras' started by Seymore, Feb 6, 2005.

  1. Seymore

    Seymore Guest

    And with old comes mean. This board is really killing itself! It's to bad.

    Seymore, Feb 6, 2005
    1. Advertisements

  2. Seymore

    me Guest

    If the regulars (they know who they are) had stuck with discussions about
    film cameras/associated equipment and condemned the OT digitrash posts we
    might not have this problem. Now look what's happening. The peanut gallery
    has seen all the acrimony and now they're going wild. I feared this might
    happen. If the regulars will join with me and maintain strict adherence to
    discussions of film cameras/associated equipment we might still be able to
    restore order to this NG. What do you say fellas?
    Film best,
    me, Feb 6, 2005
    1. Advertisements

  3. Seymore

    Lisa Horton Guest

    Here's a hint: it has nothing to do with film/digital.

    Lisa Horton, Feb 6, 2005
  4. Seymore

    me Guest

    Nor it seems does the current posts have anything to do with photography.
    However I was not referring to you when I said "they know who they are".
    me, Feb 6, 2005
  5. Seymore

    Roxy Durban Guest

    Polson, why don't you stop your childish shit and enter one of your
    ridiculously incompetent snapshots into the SI? You will never own this
    group. Never.

    In fact, why don't you get a job and become a productive member of society?
    Roxy Durban, Feb 7, 2005
  6. Seymore

    me Guest


    Is there no one you will listen to RD? Others have tried to tell you that
    I'm not Polson but still you can't see the forest for the trees. What kind
    of photographer would have such poor powers of observation as to be unable
    to tell the difference between me and Polson, or even me from anyone else in
    this NG? Surely you can see how unique my writing is.
    Film best,
    me, Feb 7, 2005
  7. Seymore

    Roxy Durban Guest

    Ha!Ha!Ha!'re trying HARD to avoid detection, aren't you, Polson! Your
    powers of composition, though ruffled as you make them appear to be, give
    you away so easily. You can put as many spelling mistakes and grammatical
    inconsistancies as you like into the mix, but you CAN'T avoid the
    occasional slip. And then BAM! The mask slips and out falls the Rodeo
    Clown. Or is that Jan?

    Your recent signature makes it GLARINGLY obvious who you are! Prove me

    The game is up, dumbass. Your idiocy will catch up with you sooner than
    you think, and by God, when it does I would hate to be in your shoes...
    Disabled or not, you will pay DEARLY.
    Roxy Durban, Feb 8, 2005
  8. Seymore

    me Guest

    Since your are too feeble minded to do it yourself I guess it's up to me to
    cast some light into your dim world. Look at the headers in this post from
    TP on 4/18/02:

    Now look at the headers of my post. What do you see? Are they not different?
    Why don't you do some research *before* you open your mouth and make asinine
    assumptions based on bupkis. Now go away and don't bother me again. I have
    bigger fish to fry and I don't have time for stumble bumbs like you.
    Film best,
    me, Feb 8, 2005
  9. Seymore

    Roxy Durban Guest

    The troll going by the handle "me" is none other than Tony Polson. An
    undeniable truth.

    Have you seen your Doctor lately, Polson?
    Roxy Durban, Feb 9, 2005
  10. Seymore

    Andrew Price Guest

    Since you're so sure of that, perhaps you could also tell us who
    posted the forged Tony Polson post:

    Message-ID: <>

    which in reality originated from an ISP in South Africa.
    Andrew Price, Feb 9, 2005
  11. Seymore

    Roxy Durban Guest

    I did.

    It was an experiment and it worked.
    Roxy Durban, Feb 10, 2005
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.