Canon 10-22 part 3

Discussion in 'Canon' started by jazu, May 9, 2008.

  1. jazu

    Paul Furman Guest

    Right.
     
    Paul Furman, May 12, 2008
    #21
    1. Advertisements

  2. The gobbledygook about "protrusions" and "3D relief" is just saying to have
    things at a range of distances in the frame to get the most effect from a
    wide angle lens.

    Extreme wide angle can get gimmicky and old fast. But I like it. A lot. I'd
    love to have a 35mm lens with a bit of shift and tilt on a 6x9 film camera.
    There's a 47mm lens on a 6x9 camera with shift (but no tilt) at a camera
    store here, but they want 15,000 bucks for it.

    David J. Littleboy
    Tokyo, Japan
     
    David J. Littleboy, May 12, 2008
    #22
    1. Advertisements

  3. jazu

    Wilba Guest

    I wish he'd just said that. :)
    Yeah, I've not worked with anything like that. I'm sure it would be
    interesting.
     
    Wilba, May 12, 2008
    #23
  4. I think you may be suspecting these words of having some special
    obscure technical meaning. They don't. They're ordinary standard
    English words which you can find in dictionaries, and in the posting
    in question when interpreted in that way made sense to me without any
    difficulty.
     
    Chris Malcolm, May 12, 2008
    #24
  5. jazu

    Wilba Guest

    Great! Please paraphrase Paul's paragraph.
     
    Wilba, May 12, 2008
    #25
  6. Why would substituting other words and phrases with the same meaning
    help? I suspect you're asking for explanation, but without knowing
    what you don't understand I don't know what bits of a possible page or
    two of general explanation you might be asking for.
     
    Chris Malcolm, May 13, 2008
    #26
  7. jazu

    Frank ess Guest

    Let it go, Mr Malcolm. No point in getting involved in a "discussion"
    with a burr who's either sub-literate or purposely obtuse.

    I'd like to see a contest between Draco and Focus (Come to think of
    it, anyone seen them in the same room at the same time?). That'd be
    like Prince and Michael Jackson going at it. I'd pay money to watch
    that. Someone must be able to imagine a subject they'd disagree on.
    Whudday think?
     
    Frank ess, May 13, 2008
    #27
  8. jazu

    Wilba Guest

    I'm only interested in understanding Paul's paragraph.
     
    Wilba, May 14, 2008
    #28
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.