Canon 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6 vs Tokina 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6

Discussion in 'Canon' started by Siddhartha Jain, Jan 17, 2005.

  1. Hi,

    I had decided to buy the Canon 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6 when I came across
    the Tokina 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6. I looked at eBay and both can be had for
    about ~$200 used, which is my upper spending limit for a telephoto zoom

    I looked at photodo tests and the Canon is rated at 2.4 while the
    Tokina is at 2.3. Nothing great, but if I was settling for 2.4, I don't
    have a problem settling for 2.3 unless owners in this NG have had a bad
    experience with this particular Tokina lens.

    Over the Canon, the Tokina has:
    1. Extra 100mm reach at the tele end and 20mm at the wide end.
    2. Metal lens barrel (Canon only has metal lens mount)

    Over the Tokina, the Canon has:
    1. Ring USM assuring faster AF
    2. the 2.4 vs 2.3 photodo test

    I read thru' reviews on several NGs and photographyreview and people
    seem to find the Tokina (as well as the Canon) good value for the money
    - 1/4th the price of an equivalent "L" series lens.
    Whats your recommendation?


    Siddhartha Jain, Jan 17, 2005
    1. Advertisements

  2. Siddhartha Jain

    birch999 Guest

    birch999, Apr 4, 2005
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.