Canon 5D II concensus?

Discussion in 'Canon' started by bowzer, Jan 11, 2009.

  1. bowzer

    bowzer Guest

    Now that the firmware update has fixed the black dot issue, can this camera
    be called "stable?" What I mean is no other glaring issues on par with, say,
    AF issues from past cams.
    bowzer, Jan 11, 2009
    1. Advertisements

  2. bowzer

    N Guest

    You bought an A900? What's the world coming to?
    N, Jan 12, 2009
    1. Advertisements

  3. bowzer

    bowzer Guest

    Wait, I thought only KR can publish "review/tests" of gear he's never
    touched? Are you actually KR?
    bowzer, Jan 12, 2009
  4. bowzer

    bowzer Guest

    Clearly, this product is not ready for those of us who eat popcorn. But if I
    just stick to Cape Code Dark Russet chips, I should be OK, right? Love those
    bowzer, Jan 12, 2009
  5. bowzer

    ASAAR Guest

    This is a digital photo newsgroup, where sibling battles are OT.
    ASAAR, Jan 13, 2009
  6. bowzer

    D.Mac Guest

    The auto focus system of EOS cameras is flawed and no amount of patches from
    Canon seem to fix the problem. Middle distance focus is hard enough at the
    best of times but when your AF sensor send the lens to infinity when it
    should still be focused closer, you are forced to use a smaller (than f/2.8)
    aperture if you expect to be able to crop someone out of a group shot.

    Not good enough on a 20D, Even worse with a 40D and unforgivable with the
    shallower DOF of a FF sensor like the 5D has. If all you are buying one for
    is it's photographic ability, There are better offerings in the Nikon range.

    If you want it for it's "video" making ability you're a bigger fool than you
    should be.

    D.Mac, Jan 14, 2009
  7. bowzer

    D.Mac Guest

    Hey fuckwit... Who hatched you? It certainly wasn't anyone human.
    D.Mac, Jan 14, 2009
  8. bowzer

    D.Mac Guest

    And this from ASAAR?
    Wow! Is this part of a new year resolution or is someone else using your PC?
    D.Mac, Jan 15, 2009
  9. Depends what you mean by stable - there are glaring issues with it, but
    it is unclear whether these will ever be recognised by Canon or fixed,
    even if they can.

    Other "issues" with the 5D-II include:
    1. excessive purple fringing around highlights at the edge of the
    frame, especially with wide angle lenses. Apparently due to changes in
    the filter stack and the reduced density of the Bayer filters that Canon
    introduced on the 5DII to improve sensitivity.
    Probably not fixable in firmware.

    2. flash exposure is about 1-1.5 stops lower than the 5D (or other
    cameras supporting E-TTLII). This is fine when flash is used for fill
    only, since earlier cameras required around -1 to -1.5 stops of FEC, so
    the 5DII gives a good fill balance at 0 FEC. However it is completely
    wrong when there is little, or no, ambient light and flash is the main
    light source. This requires +1 to +1.5 FEC to get anywhere near the
    correct exposure, which is unacceptable when the camera itself only
    provides a complete range of +/-2 stops of FEC.
    Probably fixable in firmware, but will they? They seem to have made
    this change in response to people complaining about poorly balanced fill
    flash at 0 FEC on earlier cameras, so will claim its an improvement!

    3. loads of reports of poor build quality: parts coming off in the
    mirror box during use; lens connection error messages; flash units
    switching from E-TTL to basic TTL (which digital cameras don't even
    support) because of intermittent data connections.
    Probably fixable by getting better QA at the plant, but that costs money
    they can barely afford in this recession.

    4. uneven colour balance across the frame, with slight pink casts
    in the corners (possibly linked to the same effect that makes the purple
    fringing worse).
    Possibly fixable in firmware, using data from the lens.

    5. complete lack of a 25p video standard, so PAL compatible
    down-converts either jitter (due to dropping every 6th frame), blurring
    (due to averaging frames to get the required frame rate) or both.
    Probably fixable in firmware, but will they? Canon might view 25p as an
    additional feature rather than a big fix. Canon don't generally add new
    features to cameras as it involves reprinting or adding corrigenda pages
    to their manuals.

    None of that includes any of the things its just not very good at - like
    focussing using any but the central AF point: how very last century!
    Kennedy McEwen, Jan 17, 2009
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.