Canon 90-300 or Sigma 70-300 ?

Discussion in 'Canon' started by PeterH, Jan 24, 2004.

  1. PeterH

    PeterH Guest

    I have a Canon 300D (with 28-90 kit lens) and would like to buy a larger
    zoom lens.

    I don't see the point of waiting for EF-S lenses to come on the market so I
    have narrowed the selection down to either a Canon 90-300 (f4.5-5.6) or a
    Sigma 70-300 (f4 - 5.6). The Sigma also has a macro setting and is cheaper
    than the Canon.

    Of course you need to multiple each lens by 1.6 to get the actual focal
    length for the Canon 300D.

    Any recommendations on which one to go for. The Canon will leave a gap of 90
    to 144 focal length between the 2 Canon lenses.
    The Sigma will leave a gap of only 90 to 112 between the smaller Canon kit
    lens and the Sigma zoom lens.

    Also, is there a great difference in quality between the 2 lenses? I will
    not be producing professional photos but would still like to be sure of
    getting very good resolution shots.

    thanks

    PeterH
     
    PeterH, Jan 24, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. PeterH

    Rabid Guest

    Hi PeterH,

    what a coincidence, I was in exactly the same boat this week, with a skiing
    trip coming up I wanted a telezoom for my new 300D too. didn't want to
    spend loads cos I wanna spend money on hols :0)

    I looked at the same two lenses and bought the sigma, for two reasons,

    1) there is less of a "gap" between 55mm on stock lens and 70mm on sigma
    (than 90mm on canon)

    2) it was considerably cheaper 149 UKP v 220 UKP.

    I've not used it much yet (curse those winter evenings) the macro mode seems
    good though.

    One thing to be aware of is that mine is really "sticky, notchy, jerky"
    between 200mm and 300mm, Jessops (where I bought it) have agreed that is not
    right and have ordered me a replacement (allowing me to continue to use the
    duff one in the meantime). May be worth checking yours if you go this
    route.

    If I get the chance I'll post a couple of images on my website this weekend
    for you to see.

    Let us know which way you go.

    Please note, I'm not saying the sigma is beter or the opposite, just that it
    fits my requirements at the time.

    Peter
     
    Rabid, Jan 24, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. PeterH

    PhotoMan Guest

    When did Canon start making a 90-300 lens?
    Joe Arnold
     
    PhotoMan, Jan 24, 2004
    #3
  4. PeterH

    Rabid Guest

    When did Canon start making a 90-300 lens?
    Dunno, but go google and there it is! :)
     
    Rabid, Jan 24, 2004
    #4
  5. PeterH

    Rabid Guest

    Got out this morning while the sun was out, snapped these which may give you
    some idea that the lens isnt too bad.

    quality is good on originals but adobe Album seems to add noise when it
    reduces images.

    Lemme know what you think.

    Peter
     
    Rabid, Jan 25, 2004
    #5
  6. PeterH

    ¿N¯NÄl Guest

    Don't know. But I have bought one on Jan 14. (in Hong Kong)
     
    ¿N¯NÄl, Jan 26, 2004
    #6
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.