Canon EOS 400D / 350D Comparison

Discussion in 'Canon' started by David Springthorpe, Sep 8, 2006.

  1. Any online specification comparison please ?
    David Springthorpe, Sep 8, 2006
    1. Advertisements

  2. David Springthorpe

    Smee Guest

    Smee, Sep 8, 2006
    1. Advertisements

  3. David Springthorpe, Sep 8, 2006
  4. David Springthorpe

    Fred Guest

    Fred, Sep 8, 2006
  5. David Springthorpe

    Kelpie Guest

    Hi David. I just read a comprehensive comparison on both cameras and from
    what I can tell, the 400D is newer.

    Kelpie, Sep 8, 2006
  6. Davey Trolley Pants, Sep 8, 2006
  7. Please note that I have kill-filed you globally from
    David Springthorpe, Sep 8, 2006
  8. David Springthorpe

    Oz Guest

    if he's killfiled, why are your answering him ??
    just a question
    Oz, Sep 8, 2006
    David Springthorpe, Sep 8, 2006
  10. David Springthorpe

    Oz Guest

    lost for words :)
    Oz, Sep 8, 2006
  11. Just an answer then - his message had already been downloaded here
    before the mercy killing took placed from there.....(hope that
    David Springthorpe, Sep 8, 2006
  12. David Springthorpe

    Oz Guest

    cool :)
    that did help, thanks
    Oz, Sep 8, 2006
  13. David Springthorpe, Sep 9, 2006
  14. David Springthorpe

    Kelpie Guest


    Please... No....................!
    OH MY GOD!
    Not even ant has kill-filled me! My god you must be a thin skinned frock
    wearing girlyman!

    Here ya go u big sook.

    IMHO, I wouldn't buy the 400 (if you already have the 350)
    The dust removal thingy would be nice but not enough to justify the upgrade.
    If you want a higher spec camera, wait for the 40D.

    Can someone please reply to this so David Springthorpe sees it.
    Kelpie, Sep 9, 2006
  15. David Springthorpe

    Mr.T Guest

    Or the 450D :)

    The 400D does make the 30D look overpriced now though, doesn't it!
    I think they'll need to get the 40D out sooner than their normal life cycles
    would indicate.

    Mr.T, Sep 9, 2006
  16. David Springthorpe

    Kelpie Guest

    Why wouldn't the 30D upgrade be called the 40D?
    The consensus is that the 30D was never much of an upgrade to the 20D, just
    a makeover which is why the replacement will be sooner than the typically 18
    month cycle.
    Kelpie, Sep 9, 2006
  17. David Springthorpe

    ^Temuchin^ Guest

    So much killing in Australia this week
    ^Temuchin^, Sep 9, 2006
  18. David Springthorpe

    Mr.T Guest

    It probably will, which is why I used that designation myself.
    The upgrade for the 400D however will possibly be called the 450D.
    But probably many 350D owners will wait for the 500D before upgrading the
    body. Much better to upgrade the lenses and flash first IMO!

    Exactly my point, and it will need to be much less IMO.

    Mr.T, Sep 9, 2006
  19. David Springthorpe

    Kelpie Guest

    Oh sorry, bit vague today.

    Yeah I was going to post what you said about upgrading glass. The only
    reason I replaced my 10D with the 20 was because it was stolen and I got a
    new one through insurance. My next upgrade will be the 5Ds replacement or if
    Canon comes up with a 1.3x
    Kelpie, Sep 9, 2006
  20. David Springthorpe

    Mr.T Guest

    'sOK, happens to us all.
    A pretty valid reason.
    Why 1.3x? My next will probably be a 5D replacement. I can't see much point
    of anything in between though.
    I'm betting they stick with just full frame 35mm or the current 1.5-1.6

    Mr.T, Sep 9, 2006
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.