Canon Firmware Updates

Discussion in 'Canon' started by briansgooglegroupemail, Jun 1, 2005.

  1. briansgooglegroupemail, Jun 1, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. briansgooglegroupemail

    Musty Guest

    Musty, Jun 1, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. briansgooglegroupemail

    Frank ess Guest

    Frank ess, Jun 1, 2005
    #3
  4. briansgooglegroupemail

    Darrell Guest

    How does this state that?
     
    Darrell, Jun 1, 2005
    #4
  5. briansgooglegroupemail

    Musty Guest

    Ok you missed my smiley-wink face - aka I was kidding. Here it is again
    ;-)
     
    Musty, Jun 1, 2005
    #5
  6. briansgooglegroupemail

    Musty Guest

    Musty, Jun 1, 2005
    #6
  7. briansgooglegroupemail

    Darrell Guest

    I did miss it, what firmware is the 20D on now 5th or 6th?
     
    Darrell, Jun 1, 2005
    #7
  8. briansgooglegroupemail

    Musty Guest

    I think its had enough FW upgrades that we should call it the 25D.

    Actually I really like this FW stuff. Developers put the critical
    (bug-prone) functionality in FW achieving a couple of things:
    - Faster time to market (at expense of bugs in the field)
    - Customer performs the repair with a few clicks
     
    Musty, Jun 1, 2005
    #8
  9. briansgooglegroupemail

    Frank ess Guest

    I must be a second-class registsrant. It takes them about ten days to
    get to my name.

    Thanks again, Brian.
     
    Frank ess, Jun 1, 2005
    #9
  10. briansgooglegroupemail

    Skip M Guest

    I did, and I don't...
     
    Skip M, Jun 1, 2005
    #10
  11. briansgooglegroupemail

    Alan Browne Guest

    Musty wrote:

    What it doesn't state is that they haven't sound firmware fixes for the
    reamining bugs...

    ;-)
     
    Alan Browne, Jun 1, 2005
    #11
  12. briansgooglegroupemail

    C Wright Guest

    What you say is true however, as a registered owner of Canon cameras, my
    experience is that these 'automatic' emails show up weeks rather than days
    (or hours) after new FW availability.
     
    C Wright, Jun 1, 2005
    #12
  13. C Wright wrote:
    []
    A good idea - it lets others find out the problems first!

    David
     
    David J Taylor, Jun 1, 2005
    #13
  14. briansgooglegroupemail

    G.T. Guest

    So, this firmware for the XT is just bug fixes? Sounds like it addresses
    the underexposure issues which is nice but I'd like to see them change the
    ISO, Metering, WB, AF, and Set buttons so you don't need to hit the Set
    button to make the new setting stick.

    Greg
     
    G.T., Jun 4, 2005
    #14
  15. So, this firmware for the XT is just bug fixes? Sounds like it addresses
    Definitely. And then have the B&W LCD screen show whatever your most-recent
    setting change was. Of course, what I'd *really* like to have it show is
    ISO...

    I was just looking at that screen; hard to tell how much of it is
    dot-addressable (vs pre-screened bits & pieces, which would make it
    less-likely you could reprogram it for other info and have it look decent).

    I really think displays should be user configurable. What some people find
    irrelevant others may see as the most-important thing they want to see. You
    shouldn't have to think like the camera... there should be more adaptability
    so the camera can seem to think like you.

    --Mike Jacoubowsky
    Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReaction.com
    Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA
     
    Mike Jacoubowsky, Jun 4, 2005
    #15
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.