Don't laugh but these are our first attempts at Macro...

Discussion in 'Photography' started by Thomas, Jul 17, 2004.

  1. Thomas

    Thomas Guest

    Thomas, Jul 17, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  2. Thomas

    Mike Kohary Guest

    The forks, but you're right - the lens sucks. Both pictures are
    unfortunately not useable.

    Comments, Preddy? ;)

    Mike Kohary, Jul 17, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  3. Thomas

    Thomas Guest

    I find the lens ok at between about 100 - 200 and f8 - f11, but for Macro
    work, it is shite..

    I'm looking at a 60mm f2.8 Micro Nikkor. Once I've paid for my D70 ;-)
    Thomas, Jul 18, 2004
  4. Thomas

    D.R. Guest

    I use a cheap Sigma 70-300 MacroSuperII. Not the APO. Here are two macro pics
    done with it:

    All except the 3rd shot here were done with it:

    I'm not a "photographer" as such, just someone who pickup up an SLR for the
    first time at Christmas time and got hooked. The flower was taken by hand
    (should've used a tripod) on the day I got the camera + lens and didn't know
    what "aperture" was.

    You can get acceptable shots with this lens. I read a lens test for it in a
    magazine that said that the lens is most sharp at F8, so F8 it is. The lens
    could be alot more sharp, but then it would cost 5 times as much. I mostly use
    it for portraits.

    I have just used it for photographying people surfing, @ 300mm on a tripod. I'll
    let you know if the prints turn out, as it will be a first for me. :)

    D.R., Jul 18, 2004
  5. Thomas

    D.R. Guest

    The 50mm F1.8 is worth looking at, but it's not a macro. Tack sharp and US$100!

    Check out any lens here before buying:
    D.R., Jul 18, 2004
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.