DYNAMIC RANGE LOVES THE 40D!

Discussion in '35mm Cameras' started by Annika1980, Sep 16, 2008.

  1. Annika1980

    Annika1980 Guest

    So you boosted the saturation? So what?
    The color balance looks much more natural in the 5DII pic, and there
    is details in the shadows as well. In your pic the shadows are gone.

    Oh yeah, it is no great feat to read wrting on a boat that is sitting
    on a trailer. Try doing it on a speeding boat and get back to us. I
    have a few of those shots myself.
     
    Annika1980, Sep 22, 2008
    #41
    1. Advertisements

  2. Annika1980

    D-MAC Guest

    Years ago I used ordinary consumer film to make internegs for slide
    printing. I did it by using 200 ASA at 100 ASA and altering the
    development to compensate for it. low (as in compressed) contrast
    resulted in beautiful prints otherwise only obtainable with Cibachrome
    at 5x the cost.
     
    D-MAC, Sep 22, 2008
    #42
    1. Advertisements

  3. Annika1980

    Noons Guest

    Colin.D wrote,on my timestamp of 22/09/2008 9:31 AM:

    Once again, you are demonstrating your complete
    ignorance: read the WHOLE thing, you moron.

    Prove it, moron. Don't just make empty claims: PROVE it!



    You're a complete ignorant and a demonstrable moron,
    COlin. There is not ONE instance of ANY post
    of yours that demonstrates you are capable
    of ANY smidgeon of reasoning.
    Take some time off with the sheep, you need it!
    <plonk>
     
    Noons, Sep 25, 2008
    #43
  4. Annika1980

    Noons Guest

    Doug McDonald wrote,on my timestamp of 22/09/2008 10:27 AM:
    Oh for Pete's sake! Do you even BOTHER
    answering this idiot moron?
    Last time he used film Kodachrome 25
    didn't even exist!
     
    Noons, Sep 25, 2008
    #44
  5. Annika1980

    Noons Guest

    Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 22/09/2008 12:14 PM:
    No. I left the sat exactly at default.
    THAT, is the little flaw in your argument!
    When was the last time you saw an orange boat that looks
    EXACTLY the same in the shade as in the sun? You call
    that "natural"? NO WONDER you can't see the problem...

    Bret, don't be thick, ok? It's demeaning, even for you!
    You can read SMALLER text in that image, then on the hat
    it disappears?
    Can't you pull your head off Canon's arse for long enough
    to even reason that is simply NOT natural and is IMPOSSIBLE
    unless there is something very wrong with that processor?
     
    Noons, Sep 25, 2008
    #45
  6. Annika1980

    Colin.D Guest

    Noons, 9/25/2008 10:21 PM:
    Clearly Noons is nonplussed by logical argument, so the usual ad hominem
    attacks ensue. A sad case.

    Lessee, what words descriptive of Noons come to mind? Argumentative,
    yes; truculent, often; abusive, mostly; belligerent, nearly always;
    bellicose, the same; ignorant, certainly; word-challenged, well proven;
    repetitive, obviously; knowledgeable, only in his dreams; a credit to
    his country, not likely; foul-mouthed, to the nth degree; a useful
    contributor to general photographic knowledge, not often.

    Yes, a truly sad case.

    Colin D.
     
    Colin.D, Sep 26, 2008
    #46
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.