Earth Photography: It's Harder Than It Looks

Discussion in 'Digital Cameras' started by me, Feb 27, 2012.

  1. me

    Eric Stevens Guest

    Evade, evade, evade. When all else fails, change the subject.

    Regards,

    Eric Stevens
     
    Eric Stevens, Mar 21, 2012
    1. Advertisements

  2. me

    Eric Stevens Guest

    Because its economical at present prices. Unfortunately.

    Regards,

    Eric Stevens
     
    Eric Stevens, Mar 21, 2012
    1. Advertisements

  3. me

    Eric Stevens Guest

    Do a Google search on "climate change technical literature" then come
    back and tell us whether or not you find anything relevant.
    Regards,

    Eric Stevens
     
    Eric Stevens, Mar 21, 2012
  4. me

    George Kerby Guest

    Too keep in subject of the NG in which you are addressing, do you have any
    photographs of Bob and Big Oil meeting in dark alleys clandestinely
    exchanging packages?

    Huh?!?

    Hmmm?

    <tapping fingers on desk>

    Thought not.

    LIAR!!!! Shut the **** up!
     
    George Kerby, Mar 21, 2012
  5. me

    George Kerby Guest

    Difference between you and me?

    I have a functioning cerebral cortex, while your neural bundle is obviously
    defective. Much like what was referred to last century as a "broken record":
    regurgitating the same crap, over and over, ad nauseam.

    Shut the **** UP, already...
     
    George Kerby, Mar 21, 2012
  6. Regards???

    IAE, Ray will not cite facts, just call you names.

    And, you guys, trim your damned posts!
     
    John McWilliams, Mar 21, 2012
  7. me

    Savageduck Guest

    Why?
    Only Ray, Eric, and George are reading them, so it shouldn't bother you
    one way or the other.
     
    Savageduck, Mar 21, 2012
  8. me

    George Kerby Guest

    AND a certain waterfowl...
     
    George Kerby, Mar 21, 2012
  9. Yo, Duck- You have no idea how many folks are reading this illuminating
    thread.....

    :)
     
    John McWilliams, Mar 22, 2012
  10. me

    Savageduck Guest

    ....and the blinding light is starting to make my eyes bleed.
     
    Savageduck, Mar 22, 2012
  11. me

    Ray Fischer Guest

    Nope. Only four hits, none relevant.

    Without the quotes, I don't see any relevant. Maybe you should be
    specific instead of spouting your usual denier bullshit.
     
    Ray Fischer, Mar 22, 2012
  12. me

    Ray Fischer Guest

    Back at you, hypocrite. I keep asking you for cites and references and
    you just fart more bullshit and lies.

    Where is YOUR evidence for your claim about air pollution?
     
    Ray Fischer, Mar 22, 2012
  13. me

    Ray Fischer Guest

    AND a certain yap-yap dog.

    "arf-arf -- arf (pant) arf-arf (pant) (pant) arf"
    kerby in <C6CD2583.33D14%>
     
    Ray Fischer, Mar 22, 2012
  14. me

    Ray Fischer Guest

    You're the obsessed little stalker.

    I'm not.
    Maybe before you started drinking so heavily.
     
    Ray Fischer, Mar 22, 2012
  15. me

    Ray Fischer Guest

    Notice that the denier can't even explain his own little whining,
    cvan't provide facts, can't provide cites for his claims, can't even
    justify his absurd conspiracy nonsense.
     
    Ray Fischer, Mar 22, 2012
  16. me

    Ray Fischer Guest

    Oh, so you're saying that it is EXPENSIVE to extract oil from tar
    sands. One wonders why anybody would use an expensive extraction
    method when oil is so plentiful, according to you.
     
    Ray Fischer, Mar 22, 2012
  17. me

    Eric Stevens Guest

    You are the one who made the claim. It's up to you to produce the
    evidence.

    [I didn't snip as this article contains all of Dick-heads argument]

    Regards,

    Eric Stevens
     
    Eric Stevens, Mar 22, 2012
  18. me

    Eric Stevens Guest

    Which denier and what particular claims are you talking about?

    Regards,

    Eric Stevens
     
    Eric Stevens, Mar 22, 2012
  19. me

    Eric Stevens Guest

    It's no more expensive than much of what else they are doing at the
    moment. But it's partly political and partly that they have been
    hankering to do this for generations and partly that they have already
    sunk billions into doing it. But I think it's a filthy and inefficient
    technology.

    Regards,

    Eric Stevens
     
    Eric Stevens, Mar 22, 2012
  20. me

    Eric Stevens Guest

    On 22 Mar 2012 06:18:43 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:

    --- snip ---
    I see Google is playing sill buggers again. Try
    https://www.google.co.nz/#hl=en&sug....,cf.osb&fp=700e55f47b73bf8d&biw=1428&bih=976
    and God help you if you can't handle the wrap.

    The first item is
    http://scholar.google.co.nz/scholar...=BeZqT77qOKbBiQfaqNHoBQ&sqi=2&ved=0CBgQgQMwAA
    which is a listing of relevant "technical literature" held by Google
    Scholar.
    Maybe you should try doing some research yourself.

    Regards,

    Eric Stevens
     
    Eric Stevens, Mar 22, 2012
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.