[QUOTE]\nNot the way you report it, no.[/QUOTE]\n\nYour problem. It should be obvious that the detail with commercial\ntransactions has been around for a hell of a lot longer than statute law.\n[QUOTE]\nGot a cite?[/QUOTE]\n\nHave a look at when the first of the statute law appeared.\n\nIts even arguable that stuff like the talmud is a form of common law.\n[QUOTE]\nGot a cite?[/QUOTE]\n\nThe UCC is the most obvious example with the US.\n[QUOTE]\nOr is this just the way *you* think it ought to be, so it is? \nNope.\n[/QUOTE]\n[QUOTE]\nSo far, nothing to indicate otherwise.[/QUOTE]\n\nEasy to claim. Have fun explaining the UCC.\n[QUOTE]\nGot a cite?[/QUOTE]\n\nDont need one on that either.\n[QUOTE]\nGot a cite?\nYou're so sure this is true, it should be easy to provide a cite.[/QUOTE]\n\nCites aint that easy with decisions in the small claims court.\nThey dont get listed on the net for example.