Film Q.

Discussion in '35mm Cameras' started by Annika1980, Mar 3, 2009.

  1. Annika1980

    Helen Guest


    He's not even worth the energy to reply to. Simply put, Noons creates
    lies to create arguments. He wants people to think he's one tough
    hard-ass, when in reality....well everyone knows exactly what he is.
    I remember reading his profile where he stated that he loves to cause
    trouble.
     
    Helen, Mar 25, 2009
    #81
    1. Advertisements

  2. Annika1980

    jimkramer Guest

    This one before Noons did the Pedo crap:
    http://groups.google.com/groups/pro...AAdkObSLfxeuWscEpQ_IGIdBBexY2jxCWhSvJ88-QDybg

    Now ya'all talk about pictures, and stop being rude to each other.
    -Jim
     
    jimkramer, Mar 25, 2009
    #82
    1. Advertisements

  3. Annika1980

    Helen Guest

    Helen, Mar 25, 2009
    #83
  4. noons be on a foam of his own type....
     
    John McWilliams, Mar 26, 2009
    #84
  5. Noons wrote the following about himself:
     
    John McWilliams, Mar 26, 2009
    #85
  6. Certainly the latter guess is correct. First two might be as well.
    Oh, me, me!
     
    John McWilliams, Mar 26, 2009
    #86
  7. Annika1980

    Noons Guest

    Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 26/03/2009 2:54 AM:
    Or both your monitors are absolute crap. Given that you admit one is crap and
    the other gicves the same images, the logical conclusion is obvious.
    Really? You can't read, can you? What does the word "sky" mean to you?
    Pie?
    I'm not talking, moron. I'm writing. Can't you tell the difference? No wonder
    you can't even sort out a monitor...

    You don't know enough maths to work out a figure, moron.
    It's not my PC, moron.
    Sure. Just like your "8-bit monitor".
    You better stop before you embarrass yourself even more...
     
    Noons, Mar 26, 2009
    #87
  8. Annika1980

    Noons Guest

    Noons, Mar 26, 2009
    #88
  9. Annika1980

    Noons Guest

    Helen wrote,on my timestamp of 26/03/2009 3:08 AM:
    What am I, Helen? Ah yes: you, the extremely knowledgeable and computer-savvy
    moron who can't even figure out how to click a mouse, you are gonna provide the
    light?
    You better provide proof of that crap, you pisshead STUPID BITCH...
     
    Noons, Mar 26, 2009
    #89
  10. Annika1980

    Noons Guest

    John McWilliams wrote,on my timestamp of 26/03/2009 1:14 PM:
    Have you figured out yet how to reply to posts, moron?
     
    Noons, Mar 26, 2009
    #90
  11. Annika1980

    Noons Guest

    John McWilliams wrote,on my timestamp of 26/03/2009 1:16 PM:
    Really? When are you gonna crawl up the courage to tell me that face to face,
    coward? Or you think hiding out west is enough?

    Sure.
     
    Noons, Mar 26, 2009
    #91
  12. Annika1980

    Noons Guest

    John McWilliams wrote,on my timestamp of 26/03/2009 1:12 PM:
    **** off, dickhead.
     
    Noons, Mar 26, 2009
    #92
  13. Annika1980

    Annika1980 Guest


    So you are disputing that monitors can run at only 8-bit resolutions?

    Back on topic, why can't anyone else see the banding you mention?
    Surely, not everybody in the world has crappy monitors.
     
    Annika1980, Mar 26, 2009
    #93
  14. Annika1980

    Noons Guest

    Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 27/03/2009 3:12 AM:

    When you revert back to English, we'll talk again about that stupid question.
    Hint: read your statement above and my reply. And stop asking idiotic
    questions, you're only proving what a moron you really are.
    Because no one else has even bothered checking, dipshit. Haven't you noticed
    they "kf-ed" me ages ago? Or so they claim...
    The quality of the monitor has nothing to do with it, moron.
    It's the calibration that counts. You only need a high quality monitor if you
    do a lot of printing and want the images to match n both monitor and printer.
    To just look at them like you do, any monitor suffices. It just needs to be
    properly adjusted.


    Like I said: look at the sky just above the bird on the "large" image in that
    crap site of yours. Then look at the legs on the "original" image. I don't
    know which one is more objectionable.

    Only the arsekissers who follow you everywhere could consider either of those
    acceptable.
     
    Noons, Mar 28, 2009
    #94
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.