Fixed Focal Length Lenses you use on DSLR

Discussion in 'Digital SLR' started by Alan Browne, Jun 1, 2005.

  1. Alan Browne

    Alan Browne Guest

    The lens that spends the most time on me Maxxum 7D is the magnificent
    Maxxum 100 f/2.8 macro. Very sharp and contrasty. Unfortunately at
    this crop factor it's effectively a 150mm in the 35mm fullframe sense.
    That's a very narrow 15° or thereabouts.

    My other primes are the 20mm f/2.8 (beautiful lens) which is a not too
    useful to me 30mm lens on the 7D... so, it's mounted to the Maxxum 9 now
    on a most-of-the-time basis.

    The 50mm f/1.7 is finding renewed use for portraits.

    The 300mm f/2.8 hasn't been worked too hard yet, but that's coming...

    So, in a digital world that rewards good zooms, do you use your FFL
    lenses (often referred to as primes)? Which ones, for which purpose?

    Alan Browne, Jun 1, 2005
    1. Advertisements

  2. I have 28mm and a 50mm f/1.8 primes. They're a stop and a third
    faster than any zoom I own at any focal length, so there's that.
    Also smaller and lighter, particularly the 50mm. Sometimes I use
    that as my walkaround lens when my back hurts. :)

    I used to use the 28mm pretty much exclusively, as I was trying to
    get good at using a "normal" focal length. You know, the usual
    Henri Cartier-Bresson worship. I might do it again for a little
    while, I've felt kinda photographically stagnant for the last week
    or two, and the discipline might loosen me up.
    Ben Rosengart, Jun 1, 2005
    1. Advertisements

  3. Alan Browne

    george Guest

    Most of my FFL primes are non-CPU manual focus (which means they don't
    meter on my D70). But, here goes:

    50mm f/1.8AFD -- portraits
    60mm f/2.8AF -- macro
    8mm f/2.8AI -- when I feel "creative" or am frustrated by the FOV multiplier
    doing in my lens choices <g>
    500mm f/8 -- don't use on DSLR
    24mm f/2.8 -- don't use on DSLR
    everything else is a zoom

    What do you have in mind for the 300mm f/2.8? Wildlife? Long enough for

    george, Jun 1, 2005
  4. Alan Browne

    dylan Guest

    400mm 5.6 L and 1.4x for wildlife , on 10D
    85mm 1.8 for general use
    rest are zooms
    tempted by 200mm f2.8 L (will give 280 with 1.4x)
    dylan, Jun 1, 2005
  5. Alan Browne

    Alan Browne Guest

    I'm not much of a bird shooter. I use it at fairly short distances for
    sports and some people shot. For horse jumping last year it was perfect.

    300 is not -that- long, but on the 7D is like 450mm equiv. for 35mm. So
    it can be used for birds if close enough. Add the 1.4x or 2x and a
    pretty long lens is at hand...

    The problem with the 300 f/2.8 is its size and weight. Handhoding is a
    forget about it proposition. I use a Manfrotto 58 tripod (monster)
    with a Wimberly head (monster) with the 300... so it's definitely not a
    casual use lens. I'd like to try it an airshow, the Wimberley should be
    ideal for that. I'd like to find a smaller/lighter tripod to use with
    that lens. My 190 is to small, head is wrong. Monopod is okay.

    I'd sell the 300 f/2.8 if I had a reasonable offer. I just don't get
    enough use out of it.

    Alan Browne, Jun 1, 2005
  6. Alan Browne

    Sheldon Guest

    55mm macro for close-ups
    85 1.8 for portraits
    500mm 8 mirror when you really have to reach out and touch someone.

    I recently had a chance to play with a 105 f2.8 AF micro lens and really
    like it a lot. Nice for close-ups and really tight portraits.

    All lenses are Nikon on a D70
    Sheldon, Jun 1, 2005
  7. Alan Browne

    Alan Browne Guest

    Sheldon wrote:

    Providing there's enough light or enough ISO ... I suppose a 500 @ 1.5x
    (750mm!) can really reach out..! How do the donuts look on digital?

    Post please (with highlights).

    Alan Browne, Jun 1, 2005
  8. Alan Browne

    BC Guest

    Remember, Tony Polson has taught us that aperture shape does not
    matter. Therefore, you cannot see any donut-shaped defocused
    highlights in pictures takn with a 500/8 mirror lens.

    BC, Jun 2, 2005
  9. Alan Browne

    Frederick Guest

    I sold my 28mm, 50mm , 135mm, and 200mm nikkors. I was not using them
    at all with a DSLR. I bought a 105mm macro with the proceeds, and use
    that quite a lot. My complete lens kit is 18-70, 70-210, 105 macro.
    Everything fits in a small bag. Nothing is on my wish list at present.
    Something very wide would be nice, but not at current prices thanks.
    Frederick, Jun 2, 2005
  10. Alan Browne

    DoN. Nichols Guest

    [ ... ]
    Well ... of my lenses, only two (which can be convinced to work
    with the D70 without aperture ring surgery) are zooms.

    I'll list them first:

    1) 28-105mm f3.5-4.5 D -- general purpose lens when walking around.
    Good macro capability.

    2) 80-200 f4.5 -- Has AI, but not a CPU. I have actually not yet
    used this on the D70, though I used it on the NC2000e/c before,
    as the metering worked there.

    Now the "primes":

    First the ones with CPU:

    3) 50mm f1.4 AF with CPU. Nice light lens when I can live without
    zoom -- especially when I'm doing a lot of walking. It is small
    enough to be protected by the crook of my elbow when walking in
    crowds or in other close quarters.

    It's f1.4 maximum aperture lets me do a lot more in low light
    without needing to fire up the flash.

    4) 180mm f2.8 -- manual focus, retrofitted with a CPU. Nice long
    reach (effective FL is 270mm).

    Now those without:

    5) 20mm f2.8 with AI, so I can mount it, but not use it with
    built-in metering. Exposure by hand-held meter or by guessing
    and chimping the histogram.

    Used when the zoom does not go wide enough. (Note that I do not
    have the "kit" lens.)

    6) 16mm f3.5 Fisheye -- same metering situation as above.

    Used when I need even more coverage -- or actually want the

    The lenses listed above live in the camera bag or on the camera,
    depending on my current whims -- with the exception of the 80-200mm
    f4.5. My most likely uses for that would require the metering to work
    for quick response. A pity that it is not one of the ones which can be
    converted, since I love the push-pull zoom with the same control as the
    focus (rotate to focus, slice to zoom).

    The rest live elsewhere except when needed. I'm not going to
    carry those around as a regular thing.

    7) 200mm f4 Medical Nikkor -- built in ring flash. Exposure
    calculation is built into the lens, so I just set the camera to
    manual mode and shoot. Good for evenly illuminated extreme
    close-up -- down to 1:1 or a bit beyond.

    8) 500mm f8 Reflex Nikkor. Not yet used on the D70, but I have on
    the above-mentioned NC2000e/c.

    Now -- of my stable of other, older, Nikor lenses, there are two
    which I am considering modifying the aperture ring so I can use them
    (but I have not yet modified them, so they will not yet mount).

    9) 55 3.5 Micro (Macro) -- with the dedicated extension tube to go
    beyond 1:1 ratio.

    10) 300mm f4.5 -- nice long chunk of glass, once I can mount it.

    DoN. Nichols, Jun 2, 2005
  11. Alan Browne

    Skip M Guest

    15mm fisheye Sigma, 50mm f1.8 Canon, 100mm f2 Canon, the latter two when
    speed counts...
    Skip M, Jun 2, 2005
  12. Alan Browne

    Jer Guest

    50/1.7 - indoor
    135/2.8 STF - pretty people
    200/2.8 APO - bad people
    500/8 - bad people
    2032/10 - really bad people

    The big boys haven't spanked the tender new 7D yet.

    The rest are walking zooms.
    Jer, Jun 2, 2005
  13. Alan Browne

    Stacey Guest

    Alan Browne wrote:

    50 F2 macro stays on the camera with the 11-22 close at hand..
    Stacey, Jun 2, 2005
  14. Alan Browne

    Pete D Guest

    I would have thought the 190 tripod would be okay, what head? 141?
    Pete D, Jun 2, 2005
  15. Alan Browne

    Larry Guest

    I use:

    135mm f2.8 Yashika (manual lens) with eos adapter

    50mm f1.8 Yashika (manual Lens) with eos adapter

    Along with a fully manual zoom 80-200 f4 made by Rokinon

    These lenses are all more than 30 years old. The Rokinon has some ca and
    doesn't focus as easily as the others.
    Larry, Jun 2, 2005
  16. Alan Browne

    Alan Browne Guest

    All bow to the master. Facing the other way with pants down of course.
    Alan Browne, Jun 2, 2005
  17. Alan Browne

    Alan Browne Guest

    Yeah, "okay" with the ctr column down, just not tall enough. A medium
    ball head (252RC) and that is definitely too small. Also I have to
    switch from the Kirk plate for the wimberley and the 252RC plate, so
    easier to just use the 58. I discovered yesterday that my little golf
    pull cart is ideal for lugging around large tripods and such. It has
    wide wheels on it, so should be good in the woods.

    Alan Browne, Jun 2, 2005
  18. Alan Browne

    Jeff R Guest

    Jeff R, Jun 2, 2005
  19. Alan Browne

    Alan Browne Guest

    In the context of image rendition, not all that useful... not bad shots,
    Alan Browne, Jun 2, 2005
  20. Alan Browne

    Jeff R Guest

    I've only had the lens for a few weeks, and my terrestrial
    "doughnut-infested" shots are not worth posting.

    Jeff R, Jun 2, 2005
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.