Fuji Finepix S9500 (S9000) sample photos

Discussion in 'Fuji' started by Graham Archer, Sep 10, 2005.

  1. Graham Archer, Sep 10, 2005
    1. Advertisements

  2. Graham Archer

    Rich Guest

    Horrible noise in the 400 and especially the 800 image. Black specs
    all over the 400, the 800 looks like looking through one of those
    windows they used to put in where they didn't want people to see what
    was on the other side. Also, noticeable CA in some of the images.
    The low ISO images are not too bad.
    Rich, Sep 11, 2005
    1. Advertisements

  3. Graham Archer

    ThomasH Guest

    I completely disagree. It is rather a great improvement over
    any comparable product. Noise at 400 is moderate, at 800 quite
    acceptable and 1600, well it looks like Lumix FZ20 a2 400 ISO,
    or like Canon G5 at 400 ISO!

    However, already at 400 ISO the comparative images of the
    sunflowers show numerous noise cancellation and filtering
    artifacts. We do not know enough about these images: Were
    these raw images converted, jpegs, if jpegs, what quality,
    which noise reduction option in use etc etc.

    I will wait before making any final decisions.

    ThomasH, Sep 12, 2005
  4. Graham Archer

    l e o Guest

    It's not the noise but the details get wash out at ISO 400. It's good up
    to ISO 200. It's a lot better than other P&S. The generally consensus is
    Fujifilm's SuperCCD get 2/3 to 1 stop advantage over other small CCDs.
    The rest is done through software.
    l e o, Sep 12, 2005
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.