Discussion in '35mm Cameras' started by Annika1980, May 12, 2005.

  1. Annika1980

    Annika1980 Guest

    Annika1980, May 12, 2005
    1. Advertisements

  2. Annika1980

    Mark² Guest

    What's with Natalie's new make-up paste-face?

    Is she TRYING to look like a ho?

    Sad waste of a nice looking girl...
    Mark², May 12, 2005
    1. Advertisements

  3. Annika1980

    Roxy d'Urban Guest

    What lens were you using there? They all seem a little soft.

    Golf...hmmm. Tragic waste of real estate.
    Roxy d'Urban, May 12, 2005
  4. Annika1980

    ian lincoln Guest

    Considering the interesting titles of of Aniika's posts i was expecting to
    see a nest on a golf course or something.
    ian lincoln, May 12, 2005
  5. Annika1980

    Annika1980 Guest­2005
    I noticed that, too.
    Her face seemed bloated, perhaps from Steroid use?
    Annika1980, May 12, 2005
  6. Annika1980

    Mr. Mark Guest

    Mr. Mark, May 12, 2005
  7. Annika1980

    Annika1980 Guest

    Annika1980, May 12, 2005
  8. Annika1980

    Mr. Mark Guest

    Knowing Natalie, she'll probably want to use it on her calendar next

    Mr. Mark, May 12, 2005
  9. Annika1980

    Annika1980 Guest

    LOL! You're a laugh riot!
    As you can see from this actual size crop,
    the Super 70-200 f/2.8L is tack sharp.
    Would that you were.
    Annika1980, May 13, 2005
  10. Annika1980

    That_Rich Guest

    That looks awful. You persist on making good equipment bad.
    At least you're consistent.

    The best photographers have the biggest garbage cans... except Annika
    who empties her trash @ rpe.35mm.
    That_Rich, May 13, 2005
  11. Annika1980

    Roxy d'Urban Guest

    It must have been so soft that AOL booted it into touch. That link takes
    you to a page that doesn't exist anymore.

    That lens is sharp, but you must be using it incorrectly or doing
    something wrong in PS, cos those snapshots were soft.
    Roxy d'Urban, May 13, 2005
  12. SNIP
    Downsampling, also with Photoshop, usually causes all sorts of
    artifacts. There are very few programs that do a decent job. Even if
    done well, it requires good sharpening to improve the high spatial
    frequency detail.

    Bart van der Wolf, May 13, 2005
  13. Annika1980

    Matt Clara Guest

    To me, it just looks digital. The D70 is also incapable of resolving the
    detail to make an image "tack" sharp. So's the 8000ED scanner, for that
    matter. But don't let me stop you--I'm all for pointing out Annika is a
    waste of our time and bandwidth. :)
    Matt Clara, May 14, 2005
  14. Annika1980

    That_Rich Guest

    The crop at that link has been changed since I posted the comment.
    The original link was WAYYYY oversharpened.

    That_Rich, May 14, 2005
  15. Annika1980

    B. Peg Guest

    Isn't GOLF CHICKS an oxymoron?
    B. Peg, May 14, 2005
  16. Annika1980

    Nikonf4 Guest

    We LOVE Golf chicks .... but seriously I wuld have liked a better shot of
    Karrie Web
    Nikonf4, Jun 12, 2005
  17. Annika1980

    Annika1980 Guest­2005
    Well to be truthful, Karrie isn't what we might call photogenic.
    Annika1980, Jun 13, 2005
  18. Annika1980

    ian lincoln Guest

    Well to be truthful, Karrie isn't what we might call photogenic.

    I wasn't looking at her face ;)
    ian lincoln, Jun 13, 2005
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.