Help..Digital vs film for small (35mm) and medium (2 1/4) format?

Discussion in 'Digital Cameras' started by Guest, May 22, 2004.

  1. Guest

    Guest Guest

    Can someone give me some a little help/advice? I'm looking to get "back" into photography on a limited professional scale. When I last worked in the field Nikon F and Hasselblad 500C would do most of what needed to be done for print work. Starting from scratch equiptment-wise today I'm faced with the choice of digital or film. My question is, will digital do what I need and is the cost worth the investment, or isn't the state-of-the-art quite there yet?
     
    Guest, May 22, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. "back" into photography on a limited professional scale. When I last worked
    in the field Nikon F and Hasselblad 500C would do most of what needed to be
    done for print work. Starting from scratch equiptment-wise today I'm faced
    with the choice of digital or film. My question is, will digital do what I
    need and is the cost worth the investment, or isn't the state-of-the-art
    quite there yet?

    What size prints are you shooting for? Current state of the art digital
    SLRs tie or beat 35 mm (depends on the film). How much do you want to
    spend? Are you willing to learn how to use a computer and imaging software
    (like Photoshop) to post-process your digital images? Do you want to make
    your own prints?

    You have asked a complicated question because there are so many choices and
    even more opinions! This is roughly the crossover point, in time, from film
    to digital; but that in no way means that it is also the time for everyone
    to switch to digital. You should investigate this thoroughly!
     
    Charles Schuler, May 22, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Digital still has a lot of room to grow. Sort of like computers 10 years
    ago...or this year...or any year. If you wait until a technology has matured
    then...well...it would be time to start considering one of them new fangled
    auto-mobiles.

    On the other hand...film has stabilized. I don't know of any company that is
    putting R&D money into film. The annoying side of this is the cost! It's
    hard to spend thousands of dollars on a camera knowing that we will want to
    replace it in 3-5 years. But that is what we have to do or be left in the
    dust.

    You say you want to go pro....well...pros that I see everyday,
    photojournalist mostly, all have digitals. The research is in...they did the
    research and every one went digital. Don't bet that they all went the wrong
    direction.

    The real question is what brand of camera to buy. Someone that posts here
    thinks highly of the Sigma. No pros that I know uses one...they have Nikons,
    Canons, and Fuji's. I think highly of the Kodaks. I shoot an Olympus, and
    have since the 70's...but I don't know if their new direction is a direction
    that I choose to go.


    "back" into photography on a limited professional scale. When I last worked
    in the field Nikon F and Hasselblad 500C would do most of what needed to be
    done for print work. Starting from scratch equiptment-wise today I'm faced
    with the choice of digital or film. My question is, will digital do what I
    need and is the cost worth the investment, or isn't the state-of-the-art
    quite there yet?
     
    Gene Palmiter, May 22, 2004
    #3
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.