HELP: First attempt at DV capture - corrupt signal

There's nothing i like more than finding a love letter from

I see you're having no problem replying to each of his posts, what a
load of shit you're spouting Jerry.

He quotes the body text thats all what matters, you don't need to know
'WHO' it is that said it as you can look in the thread tree if it
really bothers you to know, usenet is not a PM system, all posts are
directed to everyone who subscribes, god you're such a twat at times
you really are, the guy is looking for help and you jump on him.

Why don't you concentrate you efforts on helping him out if you're so
clued up about the whole video thing.

As before i won't reply to any smart ass comments you make to this
post, i've got far better things to be doing then fuelling your
trollathon.

 

There's nothing i like more than finding a love letter from H Bergeron

Sceneanalyzer (I think thats spelt right).

You can download a demo of it and its pretty small, will give you an
idea if its hardware or not, although i cant see how it can be
different capturing live video as opposed to recorded video, unless
somethings going mad on the timecode and its screwing with the capture
which is probably 0% chance of happening

 

You're making a huge assumption on how people have their news readers set
up, and the article retention of the various NNTP servers.

You seem to have a thing for Jerry. Just get a room or something.

Clearly you don't

 

<snip>

You utter cretin !

 

<snip the rest of your total clap-trap.

What frigging tree you cretin, there is no tree showing, there is no other
message showing. Get a clue you total CRETIN

http://www.allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?How_to_post


Were hhave all these idiot TROLLs come from FFS ?!

 

He is doing it manually, IE will leave all the replied to message intact or
it will remove all of the replied to message.

 

There's nothing i like more than finding a love letter from Dave R

Well then the other guy can't be blamed because people choose to have
posts purged once they have been read or they have the tree view
disabled, don't blame this poor guy i mean comeon it's usenet not a
fucking invitation to dinner with the queen.

The guy left the OP body text in his reply that is enough, you dont
need to know who wrote the original text do you?! This is usenet not
some private email chat lobby.

He seems a really polite guy and he's been treated like shit and i'm
defending the poor ****.

Yeah i do, this group used to be really good with many decent people
posting and loads of good information, now its just a complete joke,
hence why i cant be arsed to post on the majority of occasions
anymore, and it's mainly down to one guy i'm afraid.

I don't know how blind you are but all he does is resort to name
calling and tries to deliberately stir people up for no reason (As
we've seen).

I can't beleive people have such mental issues tbh, if he has problems
with what people say on here then why the hell cant he post in a
polite way instead of flaming and getting so easily annoyed.

 

There's nothing i like more than finding a love letter from "G Hardy"

Did scenalyzer give you any different results when capturing though?!


It's much nicer to work with split clips as you can simply delete
those that you dont require, and if you archive the .avi files direct
to a data DVD-RW its much much easier.

 

It's one line FFS. It's a de-facto standard used by millions of people
across the world. Even you.

Yes. My memory isn't a computer, I forget things, especially trivial
things, so it's nice to be reminded of who said what.

I don't see how this is relevant at all.

That's crap. This group had flame wars going on since it was created.
People have ideas on how to do things, and temperatures get hot.

Yes Jerry's baiting of Tony can wear a bit thin, as does yours of Jerry.

I don't know. Try asking him. Politely.

 

No, but it's an invitation to read and make sense of a thread, what if the
person reading the message has never seen the message that has been replied
to, HTF does the reader even go in search of the missing message if (s)he
doesn't have any quoted headers to say what the message ID is - that string
of numbers isn't just added for fun you know !

Yes, because the message might well have been edited in such a way that the
original meaning is not clear when the message is read a day, week or year
after the reply was sent. Usenet is NOT real time, messages arrive out of
sequence, messages get referred back to a week, month, year or more after it
was originally sent.

And quite correctly to, if you are defending the idiot you are no better
than he is.

So what you are saying is that since those people cam along it has become a
joke, I agree it has, seeing that I've been here since the groups CFV and
creation !

You really should get a clue before mouthing off and making a total fool of
yourself, as you did when you thought you would add your ignorant view to
the charter posting...

 

<uk.rec.video.digital , :::Jerry:::: , >
<>

If somebody reads this in a weeks time - how are they supposed to know
what you are replying too .

 

Because I left in the headers, and thus they could refer back to your
ignorant POV, but you (as a troll) edited them out to try and prove your
warped POV...

Your message SHOULD have looked like the following,

<quote>

</quote>

QED.

 

<uk.rec.video.digital , :::Jerry:::: , >
<>

(are you the same user who is telling others they dont know anything
about usenet or how it works)

No you didnt , The following is what the headers look like .

Path: news.newshosting.com!dartmaster!s01-b02.iad01.newshosting.com!
63.218.45.11.MISMATCH!newshosting.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!
fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: ":::Jerry::::" <>
Newsgroups: uk.rec.video.digital
Subject: Re: HELP: First attempt at DV capture - corrupt signal
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 18:03:18 +0100
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <JgFa0
$> <cgj2l3$dng$2surf.net>
<TRaXc.218$> <>
<dCjXc.86$> <[email protected]
130.133.1.4> <HAoXc.641$> <cgl50o$c76$1
@plaza.suomi.net> <R3pXc.702$>
<> <H8qXc.898$>
<> <qhrXc.1098$>
<> <xftXc.1401$>
<> <MPG.1b98af12b12023f98a529
@news.newshosting.com> <>
<> <[email protected]
berlin.de> <>
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de
QBYTMSo+pQZ2RVjTBM7S8QjeKUdfl+hruJHs62/vibMXrqnayq
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Xref: news.newshosting.com uk.rec.video.digital:33777

 

<snip trolling post>

You're nothing but a total cretin.

 

<uk.rec.video.digital , :::Jerry:::: , >
<>

I merely corrected your inaccuracy as to what a usenet header was and
you brand me a troll - is that one these respected usenet conventions
you spoke of earlier .

 

There's nothing i like more than finding a love letter from Dave R

hah, i've not posted here for a month or so before this, so it's
hardly wearing thin, Jerry once again turns a thread into a slagging
match, i defend the OP and somehow i'm the bad guy in your eyes.
crazy!?

 

There's nothing i like more than finding a love letter from

Yes, i am sorry Jerry, i'm making a fool of myself 'AGAIN', i can only
apologise to you, and the rest of the group. Sorry.

I must also apologise for my ignorant view to the charter posting, i
don't know what came over me, i pray for your forgiveness, sir.

 

There's nothing i like more than finding a love letter from "G Hardy"

Heheh, if a program doesnt exist, MAKE IT!

Just thinking, if you have Windows xp you could try capturing into
windows movie maker and see what results that gives you?

You've got some new breed of floppy disk there?

 

There's nothing i like more than finding a love letter from Tony

...And i thought playing monkey island on my amiga was a pain in the
arse

 

At what RPM?-)

"G Hardy"