HP printer

Discussion in 'Digital SLR' started by John McWilliams, Nov 23, 2004.

  1. John McWilliams

    Alan Browne Guest

    TIM wrote:

    This subject is OT for the rec.photo.digital.slr-systems NG per the charter.

    Please take these questions to or keep posting
    limited to rec.photo.digital .


    -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
    -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
    -- [SI gallery]: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
    -- [SI rulz]: http://www.aliasimages.com/si/rulz.html
    -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.
    Alan Browne, Nov 24, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  2. John McWilliams

    Big Bill Guest

    And a preliminary injunction against the upstart ink cartridge company
    was overturned; the message seems to be that Lexmark's action was a
    perversion of the copyright laws.

    Big Bill, Nov 24, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  3. John McWilliams

    kashe Guest

    They remain evil-minded for having tried it in the first
    place. And they're appealing. They're intransigent SOBs and that's all
    they are.
    kashe, Nov 25, 2004
  4. John McWilliams

    Big Bill Guest

    If that truly *is* the only justification you can think of, you might
    want to try a little more thinking.
    Could it not be possible that the manufacturer is aware of a degrading
    of the ink after a period of time? And limiting the use period is an
    effort to reduce complaints about poor picture quality, especially
    when the are aware of such a limitation?
    Big Bill, Nov 29, 2004
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.