Discussion in '35mm Cameras' started by Annika1980, Aug 16, 2006.

  1. Annika1980

    Annika1980 Guest

    Annika1980, Aug 16, 2006
    1. Advertisements

  2. Annika1980

    Draco Guest

    Very nice Bret. To bad that there are some
    artifacts in the background that really are

    Ooops. Need to clean my monitor better.

    Nice sharp images Bret.;-)


    Getting even isn't good enough.
    Draco, Aug 16, 2006
    1. Advertisements

  3. I love the butterfly.It's gorgeous. In regards to handling, how would
    you compare the EOS-1V to the 20D?
    I have to admit it is a big thrill and convenience when shooting with
    digital, because you see the final result right away. But I'm still a
    bit stubborn, as I like something tangible as film.
    Great pics, hope to see more with the EOS-1V.
    helensilverburg, Aug 16, 2006
  4. Annika1980

    Annika1980 Guest

    The Fabulous EOS-1V is a bit heavier and more robust. It has a bigger,
    brighter viewfinder and much better feel than the 20D. Shooting with
    it is pure ectasy. If it had a LCD to review your images it would be
    perfect! Shooting digital sure spoils you, not only for the ability to
    see your pics quickly, but mainly for the ability to adjust exposure
    settings. But there's nothing like the tactile feel when that shutter
    clicks on the Fabulous EOS-1V.
    Of course, my first thought is always, "There goes another 50 cents."
    Annika1980, Aug 16, 2006
  5. Annika1980

    Annika1980 Guest

    I've been pining for the 16MP EOS-1DsMKII for some time now.
    Then the thought hit me that I've got a nice 43MP camera sitting over
    there in the drawer.
    But scanning those slides from the Fabulous EOS-1V is such a pain!
    Gotta love the 5400x8100 image size, though.

    Tonight I'll give the computer a good workout when I make a stitched
    panorama from 4-5 images scanned at 5400 dpi. Don't know what the
    final image size will be, but it should make a nice billboard.
    Annika1980, Aug 16, 2006
  6. Annika1980

    Scott W Guest

    You have a 20D and you are going to stitch images from a film camera,
    that is just wrong.

    Scott W, Aug 16, 2006
  7. Annika1980

    Joseph Kewfi Guest

    The Fabulous EOS-1V is a bit heavier and more robust. It has a bigger,

    Well, if you don't believe that your own photography is worth 50 measly
    cents per frame, then you shouldn't bother with it at all.
    Joseph Kewfi, Aug 16, 2006
  8. Annika1980

    Rob Novak Guest

    Rob Novak, Aug 16, 2006
  9. I had a feeling it's an all around fantastic camera. It's a dream
    camera of mine. I heard it has 100% viewfinder as well.
    I agree that if it had an LCD to review your images it would be
    Thanks Bret.
    helensilverburg, Aug 16, 2006
  10. Annika1980

    Annika1980 Guest

    50 cents per keeper, yes. But when you shoot a couple humdred frames
    at a time, you can get into some real money.

    Even the price of my lab's slide processing has gone up. It used to be
    $8 for a 36-shot roll. Yesterday, I paid $10. Guess they have to make
    up the difference for the growing lack of demand.
    Annika1980, Aug 16, 2006
  11. Annika1980

    Scott W Guest

    A number of reasons, first it take a number of frames to stitch and
    this is far easier to get from a digital camera then film, say you want
    to use 40 frames as an example.

    The geometry of a digital camera is better controlled then scanned film
    so the stitching will be somewhat easier.

    At the pixel level the digital image is have far less noise, this helps
    with the control point finding routines that try to match small areas
    of one image to the other.

    Scott W, Aug 16, 2006
  12. That is quite a bit.....Shutterbug here charges me $6.50 for a roll of 36
    William Graham, Aug 16, 2006
  13. You should put together a panorama of all your bird shots....With the
    hummers in the foreground, and the big hawks and cranes in the
    background....Send it to the Audubon society.....Maybe they will make a
    mural out of it......
    William Graham, Aug 16, 2006
  14. Annika1980

    Annika1980 Guest

    Rueters might print it.
    Annika1980, Aug 16, 2006
  15. Ha! - Yes.....By the way....Have you seen, "Spike" recently? - If not, I
    suggest that he dropped his nail and is doing fine............
    William Graham, Aug 16, 2006
  16. I was thinking the same thing. Just curious to know how good ole Spike
    is doing. Maybe he found a good use for that nail and is catching more
    fish than he ever dreamed of. LOL
    helensilverburg, Aug 17, 2006
  17. Annika1980

    BobF Guest

    Do you really see different pixels at that resolution? I guess it depends on
    the film...
    BobF, Aug 17, 2006
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.