Is lightroom all Adobe hope it will be?

Discussion in 'Photoshop' started by Douglas., Mar 16, 2007.

  1. Douglas.

    Rob Guest


    Its just dickhead Doug who's always right :)
    Rob, Mar 19, 2007
    1. Advertisements

  2. Douglas.

    Rob Guest

    Rob, Mar 19, 2007
    1. Advertisements

  3. Douglas.

    Douglas. Guest

    : [snip]
    : > Where's the evidence?
    : > So far it's in what I discovered when I used one image with 6 different
    : > developers. Only two produced near identical results. RawShooter and
    : > LightRoom... Scales and fish thing, Barry.
    : Evidence for what?

    How much do Adobe pay you Barry?
    Whatever Lightroom started life as is immaterial. It and RawShooter produce
    the same flaws in processing dark detail and ACR doesn't. Any dumb fool can
    deduct from such information that even if LR and ACR have some common code,
    LR is polluted with RawShooter's God awful dark detail processing and ACR is
    not plagued with this problem to the same extent.

    Whatever you choose to try to push down my throat It doesn't change that
    fact... Can you not see that?

    Douglas., Mar 19, 2007
  4. I joined this thread simply to make the point that Lightroom and ACR
    share the same core raw conversion code. I have provided sufficient
    evidence that Lightroom is not Rawshooter in drag.

    No credible contrary evidence has been provided, for obvious reasons.
    Obviously similarity of image quality isn't evidence!

    I don't use either Lightroom or Canon, and have no motivation to
    discuss image quality issues with those products.
    Barry Pearson, Mar 19, 2007
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.