It's too bad sub-FF lenses are treated like second-class lenses by mfgs

Discussion in 'Digital Cameras' started by RichA, Sep 23, 2011.

  1. RichA

    RichA Guest

    Because ultimately, they have the potential to exceed FF when it comes
    to resolution. FF lenses would be just too expensive to maximize
    their potential. In sub-FF, probably the lenses that have come
    closest, or have exceeded top-not FF are the Olympus SHG units,
    especially when it comes to edge definition. So now we have 24
    megapixel APS sensors and 18 megapixel M4/3rds sensors, we could
    eventually see really good quality glass made just for them. In the
    meantime, you can adapt Olympus SHG's to M4/3rds.
     
    RichA, Sep 23, 2011
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. RichA

    PeterN Guest


    You haven't even answered my immediately prior question, about YOUR
    qualifications, and you go off pontificating again.
     
    PeterN, Sep 24, 2011
    #2
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.