Kodak's LS443 Camera *or* Kodak's Greediness at its Worst

Discussion in 'Kodak' started by enri, Oct 3, 2005.

  1. enri

    Ron Hunter Guest

    It would seem that a large number of consumers don't agree with you as
    Kodak is number one in sales in the US, and number 2 worldwide.
     
    Ron Hunter, Oct 6, 2005
    #61
    1. Advertisements

  2. enri

    Ron Hunter Guest

    I would agree, but getting the card out of my camera is a PITA. It
    either has to be pulled out with fingernails, or it shoots half-way
    across the room, there seems to be no happy medium. sigh.
     
    Ron Hunter, Oct 6, 2005
    #62
    1. Advertisements

  3. enri

    enri Guest

    Almost 60 users lament their experiences with Kodak.

    http://tinyurl.com/d5q2w

    Here is one:

    What a shame... (DHCQ)

    "I have to add my voice to all those who expressed dissatisfaction
    with this camera. Don't get me wrong: the machine is lovely, takes
    nice photos, is a doddle to use, looks good, not too bulky etc. BUT
    any $350 product that only lasts two and a half years is not good
    enough. We need to fight this disposable culture. Disposable is OK for
    a $20-$50 purchase. Significant outlay like $350 should buy me a
    (computer) product that will last until it's either completely utdated
    or I decide to upgrade"


    Somehow just feeling one is not alone brings calmness.

    enri
     
    enri, Oct 6, 2005
    #63
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.